Ten years of tracking mental health in refugee primary health care settings: an updated analysis of data from UNHCR’s Health Information System (2009–2018)
Abstract:Background
This study examines mental, neurological, and substance use (MNS) service usage within refugee camp primary health care facilities in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) by analyzing surveillance data from the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees Health Information System (HIS). Such information is crucial for efforts to strengthen MNS services in primary health care settings for refugees in LMICs.
Methods
Data on 744,036 M… Show more
“…In line with previous research [ 68 ] the interviews with females showed scepticism toward mental health professionals unfamiliar with their background. This might illuminate recent research showing that healthcare service utilization rates among refugees in camps are particularly low for common mental disorders [ 11 ]. Nonetheless, more females than males mentioned mental health care services as help seeking source for psychological distress.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…Health systems in camps must manage a wide range of mental, neurological and substance use problems [ 8 ]. While access to health services may often be limited, cultural variations in explanations of illnesses and preferred coping strategies and help-seeking paths may also constitute significant barriers to providing mental health services to refugees [ 9 – 11 ]. As Rasmussen, Katoni [ 12 ] point out, to treat, one must communicate, and to communicate well, one must understand the local explanatory models (EMs).…”
Background
Afghan refugees and asylum seekers constitute one of the largest groups that live in camp settings in Greece. While they experience psychological distress, they are facing significant barriers in accessing appropriate mental health care. Explanatory Models (EMs) provide a context-sensitive framework for understanding the differences between health professionals, refugees and NGOs that operate on the field. This study aims at further understanding how Afghan refugees perceive and explain depression and largely psychological distress, and how this influences their choices for coping strategies and help-seeking.
Methods
This qualitative study included six vignette-based semi-structured focus-group discussions with Afghan refugees and asylum-seekers (total N = 19, 12 female and 7 male) residing largely in camp settings in Northern Greece. The vignette describes a fictional person with symptoms of depression in line with DSM-5 and ICD-10 criteria. The interviews were recorded, transcribed, and analysed through template analysis.
Results
EMs for depression are explained through Pre-migration Traumatic Experiences (PMTE) and Post-migration Living Difficulties (PMLD) relating to camp settings. Female participants identified gender-based and domestic violence as contributing to psychological distress while males highlighted conflict and persecution. Life in the camp with associated inactivity, and uncertainty for the future, was perceived as a significant risk factor for psychological distress among females and males. In terms of coping strategies, females tended to focus on mobilizing collective resources within the camp (e.g. safe space for women facilitating emotional support), while males advocated for self-empowerment and solution-oriented coping. The value of engagement in peer helper-roles was highlighted.
Conclusions
The results highlight the potential value of community-based psychosocial approaches to support and promote mental health within camp settings. Additionally, they may inform policies and practices regarding access to appropriate mental health care for Afghan refugees. Further research is needed to establish the efficiency of such interventions in this context.
“…In line with previous research [ 68 ] the interviews with females showed scepticism toward mental health professionals unfamiliar with their background. This might illuminate recent research showing that healthcare service utilization rates among refugees in camps are particularly low for common mental disorders [ 11 ]. Nonetheless, more females than males mentioned mental health care services as help seeking source for psychological distress.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…Health systems in camps must manage a wide range of mental, neurological and substance use problems [ 8 ]. While access to health services may often be limited, cultural variations in explanations of illnesses and preferred coping strategies and help-seeking paths may also constitute significant barriers to providing mental health services to refugees [ 9 – 11 ]. As Rasmussen, Katoni [ 12 ] point out, to treat, one must communicate, and to communicate well, one must understand the local explanatory models (EMs).…”
Background
Afghan refugees and asylum seekers constitute one of the largest groups that live in camp settings in Greece. While they experience psychological distress, they are facing significant barriers in accessing appropriate mental health care. Explanatory Models (EMs) provide a context-sensitive framework for understanding the differences between health professionals, refugees and NGOs that operate on the field. This study aims at further understanding how Afghan refugees perceive and explain depression and largely psychological distress, and how this influences their choices for coping strategies and help-seeking.
Methods
This qualitative study included six vignette-based semi-structured focus-group discussions with Afghan refugees and asylum-seekers (total N = 19, 12 female and 7 male) residing largely in camp settings in Northern Greece. The vignette describes a fictional person with symptoms of depression in line with DSM-5 and ICD-10 criteria. The interviews were recorded, transcribed, and analysed through template analysis.
Results
EMs for depression are explained through Pre-migration Traumatic Experiences (PMTE) and Post-migration Living Difficulties (PMLD) relating to camp settings. Female participants identified gender-based and domestic violence as contributing to psychological distress while males highlighted conflict and persecution. Life in the camp with associated inactivity, and uncertainty for the future, was perceived as a significant risk factor for psychological distress among females and males. In terms of coping strategies, females tended to focus on mobilizing collective resources within the camp (e.g. safe space for women facilitating emotional support), while males advocated for self-empowerment and solution-oriented coping. The value of engagement in peer helper-roles was highlighted.
Conclusions
The results highlight the potential value of community-based psychosocial approaches to support and promote mental health within camp settings. Additionally, they may inform policies and practices regarding access to appropriate mental health care for Afghan refugees. Further research is needed to establish the efficiency of such interventions in this context.
“…Fine et al ’s retrospective analysis4 examines the extent to which mental health (particularly mental, neurological and substance use (MNS)) service utilisation has changed over the 10-year analysis period. The analysis included data from 175 refugee camps in 24 countries, where the number of MNS visits was compared with camp population, in relation to gender, age group and country.…”
“…Over the years, attention to mental health and psychosocial support in emergencies has grown remarkably 4 . Mental health has now become a routine part of primary health care interven tions in humanitarian settings 5 . The accumulation of evidence around a suite of brief scalable psychological interventions tai lored to the needs of people affected by emergencies has fueled optimism that we can effectively treat common mental health conditions with relatively modest means 6,7 .…”
Section: A Minimum Service Package (Msp) To Improve Response To Menta...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Social determinants of health include not only individual characteristics (e.g., income, highest completed edu cation) but also structural determinants and social arrangements (e.g., class location). Recent studies suggest that important rela tionships between genetic risk and social context may be present even at the neighborhood level (e.g., collective efficacy) 5 , and the influence of sociocultural context is likely to be greater at higher levels (e.g., racialized minority vs. dominant majority; nations with plentiful vs. scarce resources). Consequently, GWEIS limited to the narrow range captured by standard biological measures of the "exposome" will also be rather uninformative in this regard.…”
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.