2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2006.05.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ten-year Survivorship of the Anatomique Benoist Girard I Total Hip Arthroplasty

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
20
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
3
20
1
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, the main limitation of our study is that it is based on an implant especially prone to rapid wear and the initiation of OL. The overall 12-year survival for ABG I prostheses, found in our previous study, was 55% [10], which is in agreement with several studies [39][40][41][42] but contrasts with others [11,43,44]. The reasons for the disparity are still not clear, but this issue is discussed elsewhere [10].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…On the other hand, the main limitation of our study is that it is based on an implant especially prone to rapid wear and the initiation of OL. The overall 12-year survival for ABG I prostheses, found in our previous study, was 55% [10], which is in agreement with several studies [39][40][41][42] but contrasts with others [11,43,44]. The reasons for the disparity are still not clear, but this issue is discussed elsewhere [10].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Indeed, Oosterbos et al found signifi cantly better survival for ABG I prosthesis in patients with a mean age of 72 years when the youngest was 55 years old 15 . In contrast, others 17,21 used the same prosthesis in a wider spectrum of patients including those younger than 60 years and found much better survival than in the current study suggesting the reasons for observed diff erences might be more complex. Primary diagnosis is another factor that could infl uence the prosthetic survival (Tables 5a, b).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 84%
“…This signifi cantly compromised the survival of the prosthesis in spite of the fact that the vast majority of these cases were those of the Hartofi lakidis type I which should result in survivorship comparable to primary osteoarthritis 22 . Moreover, Castoldi et al used ABG I in 49 postdysplastic hips (31.2 %) and they did not report inferior results for that group of patients 17 . In addition, smaller cups were implanted more often in dysplastic cases (Table 1) resulting in the risk for revision being more than 4 times higher in cases with cups of 46 or 48 mm in size than in those with a larger cup.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The osteolytic effect of wear debris depends not only on particle size and shape but also mainly on the particle volume released into the surrounding tissue [14,24]. Numerous authors have reported, with standard 28-mm heads, linear wear rates greater than 0.2 mm per year always produce wear particle-induced osteolysis, whereas this mostly is absent at annual wear rates less than 0.05 to 0.1 mm per year [1,4,10,11,20,29,32,34,35]. Therefore, increasing wear resistance of the PE for acetabular cups has been a major target.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%