Wear particle-induced osteolysis is a major cause of aseptic loosening in THA. Increasing wear resistance of polyethylene (PE) occurs by increasing the crosslink density and early reports document low wear rates with such implants. To confirm longer-term reductions in wear we compared cross-linked polyethylene (irradiation in nitrogen, annealing) with historical polyethylene (irradiation in air) in a prospective, randomized clinical study involving 48 patients who underwent THAs with a minimum followup of 7 years (mean, 8 years; range, 7-9 years). The insert material was the only variable. The Harris hip score, radiographic signs of osteolysis, and polyethylene wear were recorded annually. Twenty-three historical and 17 moderately cross-linked polyethylene inserts were analyzed (five patients died, three were lost to followup). At 8 years, the wear rate was lower for crosslinked polyethylene (0.088 ± 0.03 mm/year) than for the historical polyethylene (0.142 ± 0.07 mm/year). This reduction (38%) did not diminish with time (33% at 5 years). Acetabular cyst formation was less frequent (39% versus 12%), affected fewer DeLee and Charnley zones (17% versus 4%), and was less severe for the cross-linked polyethylene. The only revision was for an aseptically loose cup in the historical polyethylene group. Moderately cross-linked polyethylene maintained its wear advantage with time and produced less osteolysis, showing no signs of aging at mid-term followup.

We have compared four computer-assisted methods to measure penetration of the femoral head into the acetabular component in total hip replacement. These were the Martell Hip Analysis suite 7.14, Rogan HyperOrtho, Rogan View Pro-X and Roman v1.70. The images used for the investigation comprised 24 anteroposterior digital radiographs and 24 conventional acetate radiographs which were scanned to provide digital images. These radiographs were acquired from 24 patients with an uncemented total hip replacement with a follow-up of approximately eight years (mean 8.1; 6.3 to 9.1). Each image was measured twice by two blinded observers. The mean annual rates of penetration of the femoral head measured in the eight-year single image analysis were: Martell, 0.24 (SD 0.19); HyperOrtho, 0.12 (SD 0.08); View Pro-X, 0.12 (SD 0.06); Roman, 0.12 (SD 0.07). In paired analysis of the six-month and eight-year radiographs: Martell, 0.35 (SD 0.22); HyperOrtho, 0.15 (SD 0.13); View Pro-X, 0.11 (SD 0.06); Roman, 0.11 (SD 0.07). The intra- and inter-observer variability for the paired analysis was best for View Pro-X and Roman software, with intraclass correlations of 0.97, 0.87 and 0.96, 0.87, respectively, and worst for HyperOrtho and Martell, with intraclass correlations of 0.46, 0.13 and 0.33, 0.39, respectively. The Roman method proved the most precise and the most easy to use in clinical practice and the software is available free of charge. The Martell method showed the lowest precision, indicating a problem with its edge detection algorithm on digital images.

Femoral fit in ABG-II does not predict certain radiological changes, but less proximal bone resorption confirms the design changes from ABG-I to ABG-II. A non-tight proximal fit is correlated with varus position of the stem. Thigh pain is correlated with a poor fit and fill of the femoral stem.

In total hip arthroplasty (THA) Technetium scintigraphy can help to diagnose a loose implant by detecting elevated osteoblastic activity. It has been used for timing the revision of cemented implants. In uncemented cups progressive radiological acetabular osteolysis can be present before loosening accurs, but it is probably unwise to await cup loosening before embarking on revision. We explored the possible relationship between such osteolysis and positive findings on technetium scintigraphy, to see if the technique could predict the need for revision. Between 1990 and 1996 500 hydroxyapatite-coated hip prostheses were implanted (follow-up range: 9-15 years), and technetium scintigraphy and plain radiography were performed annually postoperatively. 32 cups were revised for progressive acetabular osteolysis. We compared the introperative findings at revision with the pre-operative scintigraphic and radiographic results. The sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing progressive acetabular osteolysis by technetium scintigraphy were 34% and 0% respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of the technique for detecting loosening were 38% and 73% respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of technetium scintigraphy for detection of a either loosening or progressive acetabular osteolysis are worse than reported for plain radiography. Despite negative scintigraphy, there may be progressive bone loss at a critical level. Scintigraphy has no additional value to plain radiography as a reliable indicator for timing cup revision in the process of progressive acetabular osteolysis.