1992
DOI: 10.1080/08869634.1992.11677889
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Temporomandibular Joint Vibration Analysis in a Sample of Non-Patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
1
2

Year Published

1996
1996
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
11
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Thirty‐eight per cent of the sounds had their energy peaks in the 1000–2000 Hz octave bands. This is contrary to reports that claim that TMJ sounds have their energy peaks below 1000 Hz and only insignificant energy above that limit (Christensen & Donegan, 1992; Ishigaki et al , 1993). Knowledge about the true bandwidth of TMJ sounds is important when selecting the appropriate sensors.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thirty‐eight per cent of the sounds had their energy peaks in the 1000–2000 Hz octave bands. This is contrary to reports that claim that TMJ sounds have their energy peaks below 1000 Hz and only insignificant energy above that limit (Christensen & Donegan, 1992; Ishigaki et al , 1993). Knowledge about the true bandwidth of TMJ sounds is important when selecting the appropriate sensors.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 82%
“…A large part of the TMJ sound recordings discussed in the literature have been made using accelerometers placed in contact with the skin over the TMJ (Christensen & Donegan, 1992; Ishigaki et al , 1993). Accelerometers are widely used for vibration analysis in engineering applications.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study confirmed that TMJ sounds are common in a non-patient population (subjects that did not have any subjective need for treatment), and more common in females than in males (Egermark- Eriksson, 1982;Wanman & Agerberg, 1990;Christensen et al, 1992). The lower curve shows the lowest level of sound that can be detected and the upper curve indicates where sound is beginning to feel painful.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Although the results seem to be reliable, as many as 25% of normal joints have been erroneously diagnosed as being abnormal using this technique. 21 Studies of vibration analysis have concluded that there is no clinical advantage to its use over a conventional stethoscope. 2…”
Section: Diagnostic Devicesmentioning
confidence: 99%