2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2018.11.011
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

TEMPORARY REMOVAL: Aerial imagery for roof segmentation: A large-scale dataset towards automatic mapping of buildings

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
74
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
2

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 109 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
1
74
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It aims to classify each pixel with a corresponding class. Various semi-automatic and automatic methods [1] [2] [3] [4] have been developed to improve segmentation accuracy within this method; traditionally, feature extraction and classification are its two main steps. The extraction of such handcrafted features usually require a strong domain-specific knowledge.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It aims to classify each pixel with a corresponding class. Various semi-automatic and automatic methods [1] [2] [3] [4] have been developed to improve segmentation accuracy within this method; traditionally, feature extraction and classification are its two main steps. The extraction of such handcrafted features usually require a strong domain-specific knowledge.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3D information still needs to be included in the CNN-based boundary classification. Compared to computer vision, the amount and size of benchmark image data are marginal: Existing benchmarks cover aerial data for urban object classification [38] and building extraction [39], satellite imagery for road extraction, building extraction and land cover classification [40], as well as satellite and aerial imagery for road extraction [41]. Such benchmarks in combination with open data initiatives for governmental cadastral data [42], aerial imagery [43] and crowdsourced labeling [44][45][46] may propel deep learning frameworks for cadastral boundary delineation, i.e., cadastral intelligence.…”
Section: Limitations and Future Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Deep-learning methods, especially FCN-based models, are widely adopted for automatic building extraction from large-scale aerial images [57,58]. Compared to conventional methods, the FCN-based models significantly improve segmentation performance when tested on various benchmark datasets [59,60]. Recently, more advanced FCN-based models have enhanced feature representation capabilities to achieve better model performance (e.g., FPN, MC-FCN, and BR-Net).…”
Section: Regarding the Proposed Feature Alignment Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%