2018
DOI: 10.1037/fam0000398
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Temporality of couple conflict and relationship perceptions.

Abstract: Using 5 waves of longitudinal survey data gathered from 3,405 couples, the present study investigates the temporal associations between self-reported couple conflict (frequency and each partner's constructive and withdrawing behaviors) and relationship perceptions (satisfaction and perceived instability). Autoregressive cross-lagged model results revealed couple conflict consistently predicted future relationship perceptions: More frequent conflict and withdrawing behaviors and fewer constructive behaviors for… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
1
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
30
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, as previously stated, couple communication is very important for maintaining the satisfaction of one's relationship (Brassard et al, 2009;Feeney, & Karantzas, 2017). This association has been signifi cant in both cross-sectional and longitudinal designs (Lavner, Karney, & Bradbury, 2016), and some aspects of couple communication, such as its frequency and confl ict are associated with higher, respectively lower satisfaction (Collins, & Horn, 2019;Johnson, Horne, Hardy, & Anderson, 2018). Nevertheless, love talk (i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Finally, as previously stated, couple communication is very important for maintaining the satisfaction of one's relationship (Brassard et al, 2009;Feeney, & Karantzas, 2017). This association has been signifi cant in both cross-sectional and longitudinal designs (Lavner, Karney, & Bradbury, 2016), and some aspects of couple communication, such as its frequency and confl ict are associated with higher, respectively lower satisfaction (Collins, & Horn, 2019;Johnson, Horne, Hardy, & Anderson, 2018). Nevertheless, love talk (i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Other, more private topics (e.g., use of contraceptives, health, but also personality) are assessed via a computer-assisted self-administered interview, which means that these questions are answered directly by the interviewees via a handheld computer (Huinink et al 2011). In addition to the interviewed anchor participants, their partners are sent questionnaires upon consent (for more information, see Johnson et al 2017Johnson et al , 2018. This multi-actor design allows us to combine data from both the anchors and their partners into a dyadic dataset (Kenny et al 2006).…”
Section: Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Respondents answered on a Likert-type rating scale ranging from 0 (very dissatisfied) to 10 (very satisfied). This item closely corresponds to other commonly-used single item measures of relationship satisfaction in couple research (e.g., Johnson et al 2018;Rhoades et al 2012). As relationship satisfaction was assessed at every wave, we used all available data points to model change in relationship satisfaction over time.…”
Section: Relationship Satisfactionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tidak dapat dipungkiri bahwa ketidakmampuan dalam menjalani proses pernikahan akan menyebabkan timbulnya konflik dan pertentangan yang apabila tidak diselesaikan dengan baik, akan berakhir dengan perpisahan [8].…”
Section: Pendahuluanunclassified