2015
DOI: 10.1121/1.4922327
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Temporal weighting of binaural information at low frequencies: Discrimination of dynamic interaural time and level differences

Abstract: The importance of sound onsets in binaural hearing has been addressed in many studies, particularly at high frequencies, where the onset of the envelope may carry much of the useful binaural information. Some studies suggest that sound onsets might play a similar role in the processing of binaural cues [e.g., fine-structure interaural time differences (ITD)] at low frequencies. This study measured listeners' sensitivity to ITD and interaural level differences (ILD) present in early (i.e., onset) and late parts… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These studies have shown less than expected improvement as a function of stimulus duration, suggesting that the earliest part of the signal contributes more information than later parts (e.g., Houtgast and Plomp, 1968;Hafter and Dye, 1983). Other studies have used time varying ITDs and ILDs and have obtained discrimination results supporting greater sensitivity to these cues near signal onset (Stecker and Brown, 2012;Stecker and Bibee, 2014;Diedesch and Stecker, 2015). Yost (2016), using a localization paradigm, recently showed no improvement in accuracy as duration increasing from 25 to 450 ms. Other studies have directly probed ITD or ILD sensitivity using temporal segments embedded within a longer noise and have found best sensitivity at onset, followed by a period of very poor sensitivity, followed by gradual improvement in sensitivity tens of ms after onset (Zurek, 1980;Akeroyd and Bernstein, 2001).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…These studies have shown less than expected improvement as a function of stimulus duration, suggesting that the earliest part of the signal contributes more information than later parts (e.g., Houtgast and Plomp, 1968;Hafter and Dye, 1983). Other studies have used time varying ITDs and ILDs and have obtained discrimination results supporting greater sensitivity to these cues near signal onset (Stecker and Brown, 2012;Stecker and Bibee, 2014;Diedesch and Stecker, 2015). Yost (2016), using a localization paradigm, recently showed no improvement in accuracy as duration increasing from 25 to 450 ms. Other studies have directly probed ITD or ILD sensitivity using temporal segments embedded within a longer noise and have found best sensitivity at onset, followed by a period of very poor sensitivity, followed by gradual improvement in sensitivity tens of ms after onset (Zurek, 1980;Akeroyd and Bernstein, 2001).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Although this series of papers has focused on periodically modulated high-frequency sounds, other studies have used alternative approaches to also demonstrate correlates of onset dominance at lower frequencies and in pure tones (Dietz et al, 2013;Stecker and Bibee, 2014;Diedesch and Stecker, 2015). Together, results suggest that onset dominance is a general phenomenon of binaural hearing, impacting a wide range of frequencies and cue types, including fine-structure ITD, envelope ITD, and ILD (Stecker, 2016b).…”
Section: A Review Of Key Twf Featuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Weighting across frequency is demonstrated in studies of "binaural interference" that reveal the dominance of low-over high-frequency ITD cues and high-over low-frequency ILD cues (McFadden and Pasanen, 1976;Heller and Trahiotis, 1995;Heller and Richards, 2010). Weighting over time is demonstrated by the dominance of onset over later-arriving binaural cues in lowfrequency pure tones (Stecker and Bibee, 2014;Diedesch and Stecker, 2015) and rapidly modulated sounds (Hafter and Dye, 1983;Saberi, 1996;Freyman et al, 1997;Stecker, 2014). Each of these examples appears consistent with the dominance of more reliable over less reliable cues.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 81%