1992
DOI: 10.2307/2409959
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Temporal Stability of Third-Chromosome Inversion Frequencies in Drosophila persimilis and D. pseudoobscura

Abstract: Why are offspring born larger when it is colder? Phenotypic plasticity for offspring size in the cladoceran Simocephalus vetulus (Miiller).

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If the inversion also happens to capture recessive deleterious alleles at other loci, this can generate associative overdominance that will stabilize the inversion at an intermediate frequency. This situation is consistent with the stable inversion polymorphisms observed, for example, in natural populations of D. persimilis (Coyne et al 1992) and laboratory populations of D. pseudoobscura (Dobzhansky 1954;Wallace 1968;Ohta 1971). If the fitnesses of alleles involved in local adaptation vary with environmental conditions, as suggested by laboratory experiments on flies (Dobzhansky 1954), then the inversion frequencies could cycle seasonally, as is seen in D. pseudoobscura (Epling et al 1953;Dobzhansky 1971).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…If the inversion also happens to capture recessive deleterious alleles at other loci, this can generate associative overdominance that will stabilize the inversion at an intermediate frequency. This situation is consistent with the stable inversion polymorphisms observed, for example, in natural populations of D. persimilis (Coyne et al 1992) and laboratory populations of D. pseudoobscura (Dobzhansky 1954;Wallace 1968;Ohta 1971). If the fitnesses of alleles involved in local adaptation vary with environmental conditions, as suggested by laboratory experiments on flies (Dobzhansky 1954), then the inversion frequencies could cycle seasonally, as is seen in D. pseudoobscura (Epling et al 1953;Dobzhansky 1971).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…No information is available on the interaction of D. subobscura and D. persimilis since no D. persimilis were captured in my collections. This absence is unusual, since Dobzhansky and Epling (1944) noted that it was once abundant very near Goldendale, and Coyne et al (1992) captured several D. persimilis females in Seattle and Bellingham in the early 1980s in August/September. Additionally, I analyzed the chromosomes from native obscura-subgroup flies that were collected in Seattle in September 1993, and again, all were D. pseudoobscura (N=26).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Few variations have been observed over this period, excepting for PP and TL arrangements. Several natural populations of D. persimilis, a sibling species of D. pseudoobscura have also been sampled during a long period, but no changes were detected (Coyne et al .1992). Some populations of D. robusta did not show significant consistent temporal changes (Carson 1958) but others showed some significant changes (Levitan 1982;Etges 1984).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%