2006
DOI: 10.1525/mp.2006.24.1.37
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Temporal Information Processing in Musicians and Nonmusicians

Abstract: JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

19
137
4
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 182 publications
(162 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
(58 reference statements)
19
137
4
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Another study conducted with professional and amateur singers, signing in and out of key, showed the superiority of musicians who have received proper music theory training over the years in the temporal ordering tests compared to those who did not receive any theoretical training in music, which showed that exposure to music theory is a contributing factor to the auditory temporal processing (10) . Other studies with musicians who played a musical instrument and non-musicians showed that those with the greatest musical aptitude show superiority in temporal processing when compared to non-musicians (9,11) . There is a theoretical gap in the literature in relation to studies covering musicians and temporal processing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Another study conducted with professional and amateur singers, signing in and out of key, showed the superiority of musicians who have received proper music theory training over the years in the temporal ordering tests compared to those who did not receive any theoretical training in music, which showed that exposure to music theory is a contributing factor to the auditory temporal processing (10) . Other studies with musicians who played a musical instrument and non-musicians showed that those with the greatest musical aptitude show superiority in temporal processing when compared to non-musicians (9,11) . There is a theoretical gap in the literature in relation to studies covering musicians and temporal processing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…A considerable body of research suggests that musicians tend to out-perform non-musicians in perceiving fine differences in a number of basic auditory properties, including frequency and/or pitch (Spiegel & Watson, 1984;Micheyl et al, 2006;Kishon-Rabin et al, 2001;Amir, Amir & Kishon-Rabin, 2003;Nikjeh, Lister & Frisch, 2009;Koelsch, Schröger & Tervaniemi, 1999;Parbery-Clark et al, 2009b), tone interval size (Zarate, Ritson & Poeppel, 2012Siegel & Siegel, 1977), temporal interval size (Rammsayer & Altenmüller, 2006;Cicchini et al, 2012;Ehrle & Samson, 2005), and timbre (Pitt, 1994). Below, we review evidence for lower-level and contextually-relevant perceptual advantages in differently trained musician cohorts.…”
Section: Musicianship and Auditory Perceptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Musicians had more right matches for isolate tones than non-musicians (Table 1). It is known that musicians have better frequency perception and discrimination than non--musicians (13)(14)(15)(16)(17) and the lack of musical exposure may be one of the causes for a possible pitch-matching inaccuracy (2) . During the task that involved the reproduction of a sound sequencing of frequency patterns, musicians also showed a better performance when compared to non-musicians (Table 2).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is known that musical experience enhance auditory perception, both of duration and frequency, given that musicians are superior to non-musicians (18)(19)(20) . When comparing isolate tone tasks with tone sequencing, both groups had more right matches at the isolate tone task and, for the NMG, the sequencing task turned out to be more difficult ( Table 3), showing that it seems that musical learning, either formal or informal, helps the individual to overcome this greater difficulty that is the sound sequencing (13)(14)(15)(16)(17) . This fact corroborates the study that concluded that the longer the sequence of auditory stimuli for the sequencing task, the more difficult the activity becomes, since it involves a greater number of auditory abilities (12) and a greater auditory processing refinement (21) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%