Temporal increase of Varroa mites in trap frames used for drone brood removal during the honey bee season

Abstract

Varroa mites are highly attracted to drone brood of honey bees (Apis mellifera), as it increases their chance of successful reproduction. Therefore, drone brood removal with trap frames is common practice among beekeepers in Europe and part of sustainable varroa control. However, it is considered labour‐intensive, and there are doubts about the effectiveness of this measure. At present, it is mostly unknown how many mites a drone frame can carry at different times of the season, and how many mites can be removed on average if this measure is performed frequently. Therefore, we sampled a total of 262 drone frames with varying proportion of capped cells (5–100%) from 18 different apiaries. Mites were washed out from brood collected from mid‐April to mid‐July based on a standard method to obtain comparable results. We found that a drone frame carried a median of 71.5 mites, and with the removal of four trap frames, about 286 mites can be removed per colony and season. In addition, mite counts were significantly higher in June and July than in April and May (Tukey‐HSD, P < 0.05). The number of mites and the proportion of capped cells, however, were not correlated (R2 < 0.01, P < 0.05). Our results suggest that drone brood removal is effective in reducing Varroa destructor numbers in colonies, supporting the findings of previous studies on the efficacy of this measure. Although mite counts varied, we believe that increasing sample size over different seasons and locations could elucidate infestation patterns in drone brood and ultimately improve drone brood removal as an integrated pest management tool for a wider audience of beekeepers.

Simulation of Varroa mite control in honey bee colonies without synthetic acaricides: Demonstration of Good Beekeeping Practice for Germany in the BEEHAVE model

“…Starting the removal of frames (with late larval stages or fully capped) at the beginning of the season at well‐defined intervals (2–3 weeks) will ensure the effectiveness of the method. This allows between 3 and 5 frames to be removed (Odemer et al, 2022; Whitehead, 2016).…”

“…Yet, further scientific input is equally important to be collected. Exemplary for this need is a recent study that provides empirical data on how many mites a single drone frame can carry and how this is affected by the season (Odemer et al, 2022). These are important and necessary baseline data for the further development of BEEHAVE, and we very much encourage their publication.…”

“…Yet, further scientific input is equally important to be collected. Exemplary for this need is a recent study that provides empirical data on how many mites a single drone frame can carry and how this is affected by the season (Odemer et al, 2022).…”

Economic Sustainability Assessment of a Beekeeping Farm in Hungary

“…It is essential to maintain sectors that provide local employment opportunities. Beekeeping, as a labour-intensive sector [12,17,18], can contribute to solving this problem. A specific feature of the Hungarian sector is that there are relatively few beekeepers with at least 150 bee colonies.…”

“…It is essential to maintain sectors that provide local employment opportunities. Beekeeping, as a labour-intensive sector [12,17,18], can contribute to solving this problem.…”