2011
DOI: 10.1657/1938-4246-43.2.246
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Temporal Changes in Elevation of the Debris-Covered Ablation Area of Khumbu Glacier in the Nepal Himalaya since 1978

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
60
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
5
60
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Non-uniform glacier surface displacement is an important consideration if investigating lower magnitude processes such as sub-debris melt, which also requires quantification of glacier emergence velocity (Vincent and others, 2016). Emergence velocity is expected to be low on slow-moving low gradient debris-covered glacier tongues (Nuimura and others, 2011); however, positive surface elevation change was observed in this study (e.g. Fig.…”
Section: Future Workmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Non-uniform glacier surface displacement is an important consideration if investigating lower magnitude processes such as sub-debris melt, which also requires quantification of glacier emergence velocity (Vincent and others, 2016). Emergence velocity is expected to be low on slow-moving low gradient debris-covered glacier tongues (Nuimura and others, 2011); however, positive surface elevation change was observed in this study (e.g. Fig.…”
Section: Future Workmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Both glaciers are typified by considerable supraglacial relief, with the height difference between peaks and troughs estimated at 20-50 m (observed during 2009 field work and reported in Benn and Owen, 2002). Downwasting or thinning of Khumbu Himalayan glaciers has been observed over the past several decades (Bolch et al, 2008aNuimura et al, 2011). In addition to downwasting, backwasting -the ablation which occurs on exposed ice faces in debris covered areas -is another primary melt mechanism active on Khumbu Himalayan glaciers.…”
Section: Study Areamentioning
confidence: 98%
“…7 raises the possibility that stagnant zones will extend farther up many glaciers if the current warming trend continues. Seko et al (1998) and Nuimura et al (2011) have presented evidence for a progressive decrease in velocities in the upper ablation zone of Khumbu Glacier since the 1950s. In the zone of prominent ice pinnacles near Everest Base Camp below Khumbu Icefall, for example, velocities decreased from~56 m yr − 1 to~40 m yr − 1 (1978)(1979)(1980)(1981)(1982)(1983)(1984) and then to~20 m yr − 1 (1995)(1996)(1997)(1998)(1999)(2000)(2001)(2002)(2003)(2004).…”
Section: Ice Velocitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Combined velocity and thickness data are available for only one glacier (Khumbu Glacier: Gades et al, 2000;Bolch et al, 2008b;Quincey et al, 2009), although coverage is incomplete. Nuimura et al (2011) conducted a mass-continuity analysis of part of Khumbu Glacier, and found that the area below the icefall had undergone little net elevation change, apparently due to the opposing effects of reduced ice flux from the accumulation zone and less negative mass balance. Insufficient data are available for glacier-wide analyses, but in the following sections we use measurements of ice velocity together with theoretical considerations to identify the main controls on the observed patterns of elevation change.…”
Section: Recent Changes In Glacier Volumementioning
confidence: 99%