2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.03.055
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Temporal change of Distance to Nature index for anthropogenic influence monitoring in a protected area and its buffer zone

Abstract: This study applied and evaluated the temporal change of the Distance to Nature index (D2N) for land use and cover monitoring in the Irati National Forest and its buffer zone (Southern Brazil) between 1986 and 2016. This study addressed the following questions: (1) Which land use dynamics were observed between 1986 and 2016 in the Irati National Forest and its buffer zone? (2) Is the analysis of D2N evolution relevant to assess landscape dynamics in protected areas and their buffer zones? The degree of naturaln… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This trend is supported by the predominance of areas with medium/low and low naturalness, categorized by UI values between > 0.5 to 1.0 (Table 2). The predominance of agricultural anthropic areas reverting to landscapes with low naturalness is also reported in other studies[23] [45][46].…”
supporting
confidence: 78%
“…This trend is supported by the predominance of areas with medium/low and low naturalness, categorized by UI values between > 0.5 to 1.0 (Table 2). The predominance of agricultural anthropic areas reverting to landscapes with low naturalness is also reported in other studies[23] [45][46].…”
supporting
confidence: 78%
“…The effectiveness of BZs that are already established, as well as the concern for preserving their biodiversity, has been the object of study of several researchers. Authors, such as Moraes et al 2015, Nora et al (2009), Lima et al (2013), Moraes et al (2017), and Almeida et al (2018), verified the low effectiveness of BZs in some Brazilian CUs. Costa et al (2011) verified that most of Brazilian CUs face serious problems such as land issues, deforestation, and burnings, as well as a lack of personnel and infrastructure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…However, setting a buffer radius in the preprocessing process has been blurred by a suite of previous studies and remains a point of contention, with some having acknowledged the selection standards (e.g., funding projects), whereas others just followed previous studies. For this reason, various radius have been adopted when it comes to assessing the effectiveness of protected areas i.e., 1 km, 5 km, 10 km, 25 km, 50 km, 100 km, and so on [83][84][85][86], which could undermine the comparability of the individual work and result in a bias in the effectiveness outcome if there remains a lack of consideration of the ratio between the LULC resolution and the buffer radius.…”
Section: Limitations and Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%