2012
DOI: 10.2134/agronj2012.0081
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Temporal and Spatial Influence of Perennial Upland Buffers on Corn and Soybean Yields

Abstract: Contour perennial buffers within cropland reduce pollutants from watersheds, but may interfere and affect crop yields at the crop‐buffer interface. The objective of this study was to evaluate the temporal and spatial effects of agroforestry (AGF) and contour grass (CGS) buffers on no‐till corn (Zea mays L.) and soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] yields in the claypan region of Missouri. The CGS buffers (4.5‐m width) contained redtop (Agrostis gigantean Roth), brome grass (Bromus spp.), and birdsfoot trefoil (Lot… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
6
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…These are the same five models used by Baffaut et al (2017) to evaluate an uncalibrated best professional judgement (BPJ) model parameterization. The general watershed characteristics, data collection, and methods of calibration and validation are described in papers within this special issue (Baffaut et al, 2017; Bhandari et al, 2017) and in previously published works (Udawatta et al, 2002; Zeimen et al, 2006; Senaviratne et al, 2012, 2013, 2014; Sweeney et al, 2012). Calibration of each SSCM started with the BPJ control file options and parameters and resulted in five SSCMs that differed from the BPJ parameterization for three options in the control file (Supplemental Table S2) and 21 values in the parameter file (Supplemental Table S3).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These are the same five models used by Baffaut et al (2017) to evaluate an uncalibrated best professional judgement (BPJ) model parameterization. The general watershed characteristics, data collection, and methods of calibration and validation are described in papers within this special issue (Baffaut et al, 2017; Bhandari et al, 2017) and in previously published works (Udawatta et al, 2002; Zeimen et al, 2006; Senaviratne et al, 2012, 2013, 2014; Sweeney et al, 2012). Calibration of each SSCM started with the BPJ control file options and parameters and resulted in five SSCMs that differed from the BPJ parameterization for three options in the control file (Supplemental Table S2) and 21 values in the parameter file (Supplemental Table S3).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The buffer also needs to be perpendicular to the wind direction or the runoff slope to realize the maximum benefits. Benefits of buffer strips include improved microclimate, water conservation, and soil protection, which improve growing conditions (Bang et al 2010;Cleugh et al 1998) and increase crop yield (Senaviratne et al 2012). Wind barrier research under irrigated conditions is limited.…”
Section: Benefits Of Circular Buffer Stripsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus it will realize most of the benefits regardless of wind direction or slope. Similarly, planting grass or tree buffer strips on contours or across the slope to minimize water erosion have shown promise (Senaviratne et al 2012). When the direction of the resource or pollutant movement is known, building a barrier across it will reduce the loss of that resource or pollutant.…”
Section: Feasibility Of Circular Buffer Stripsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Om het effect van houtkanten/bomenrijen op voedselproductie te onderzoeken, voerde Van Vooren een meta-analyse uit (Van Vooren et al 2016) waarin 12 studies (Chirko et al 1996, Singh et al 1998, Chaves 2001, Woodall & Ward 2002, Reynolds et al 2007, Esterka 2008, Stamps et al 2009, Senaviratne et al 2012, Gao et al 2013 (1,64 tot 9,52 x boomhoogte) bedraagt gemiddeld 7%. Een mogelijke verklaring voor het positief effect is een verbeterd microklimaat: bomen functioneren als een windscherm, waardoor er beschutte zones met lagere windsnelheden ontstaan.…”
Section: Effect Op De Esd Voedselproductieunclassified