2015
DOI: 10.1007/s11277-015-2286-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Temporal Analysis of a 3D Ellipsoid Channel Model for the Vehicle-to-Vehicle Communication Environments

Abstract: In vehicle-to-vehicle (V2V) communication scenarios, the antenna heights of the communicating nodes are typically lower than the heights of scattering objects in the vicinity of these nodes such that signal propagation in the elevation plane cannot be ignored. Therefore, it is necessary to consider three-dimensional (3D) space for modeling radio propagation in V2V communication environments. In this paper, the temporal characteristics of a 3D semi-ellipsoid geometrical channel model for V2V communication scena… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
35
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The absolute difference between the TSDs of analytical (proposed) and empirical curves is observed to be 0.05°, 2.707°, 0.55°, 4.93°, 4.38°, and 1.42° in Figure A‐F, respectively. Moreover, the proposed model provides an improvement of 0.01°, 0.15°, 0.03°, 3.563°, 1.721°, and 4.722° in the accuracy of model fitness over measurement results shown in Figure A‐F, respectively, when compared to a notable 3‐D analytical model in the literature . Moreover, for indoor propagation environments, the difference in fitness of analytical (proposed) results over measurement data sets is observed to be 0.12°, 3.55°, and 0.34° in Figure A‐C, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The absolute difference between the TSDs of analytical (proposed) and empirical curves is observed to be 0.05°, 2.707°, 0.55°, 4.93°, 4.38°, and 1.42° in Figure A‐F, respectively. Moreover, the proposed model provides an improvement of 0.01°, 0.15°, 0.03°, 3.563°, 1.721°, and 4.722° in the accuracy of model fitness over measurement results shown in Figure A‐F, respectively, when compared to a notable 3‐D analytical model in the literature . Moreover, for indoor propagation environments, the difference in fitness of analytical (proposed) results over measurement data sets is observed to be 0.12°, 3.55°, and 0.34° in Figure A‐C, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Unlike conventional cellular systems that have BS antenna height above or at rooftop levels, the antenna height of M2M nodes is expected to be typically much lower than the surrounding scatterers such as buildings, trees, and other objects. For example, in vehicle‐to‐vehicle (V2V) channels, which constitute a special case of M2M communications, this differing propagation environment has led to many investigations into appropriate 2‐dimensional (2‐D) and 3‐dimensional (3‐D) models . In the work of Paul et al, a uniform distribution of scatterers in circular regions is assumed around each MS, and the ToA and AoA statistics are investigated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, there are three fundamental approaches to channel modeling: deterministic, geometry-based stochastic, and the tapped delay line (TDL) based stochastic models [8]. The author in [13] used ray-tracing software to model the deterministic environment, but its computational cost is exponentially increased with accuracy requirement.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to a dynamic change of speed and angle of motion for vehicles and moving scatterers the radio propagation conditions change rapidly, leading to nonstationary channel properties. For an accurate description of V2V elevation plane, 3D channel models have been proposed in [6,8,20,21], for a more precise spatial and temporal description of the V2V communication links relative to that provided by 2D channel models.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation