2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.radmeas.2013.01.049
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Temperature variations as a source of uncertainty in medical fiber-coupled organic plastic scintillator dosimetry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

5
49
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
(9 reference statements)
5
49
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, their small size allows them to be placed inside narrow BT catheters inserted in the tumor region, and real-time monitoring of the detector response facilitates online error detection. The response of ISDs to absorbed dose in water is, in contrast to that of PSDs, dependent on the photon energy spectrum (Rogers 2009), while both ISD and PSD responses exhibit temperature dependence (Edmund and Andersen 2007, Beddar 2012, Wootton and Beddar 2013, Buranurak et al 2013). However, the energy and temperature dependences can be corrected for with fairly straightforward methods (Wootton and Beddar 2013, Reniers et al 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, their small size allows them to be placed inside narrow BT catheters inserted in the tumor region, and real-time monitoring of the detector response facilitates online error detection. The response of ISDs to absorbed dose in water is, in contrast to that of PSDs, dependent on the photon energy spectrum (Rogers 2009), while both ISD and PSD responses exhibit temperature dependence (Edmund and Andersen 2007, Beddar 2012, Wootton and Beddar 2013, Buranurak et al 2013). However, the energy and temperature dependences can be corrected for with fairly straightforward methods (Wootton and Beddar 2013, Reniers et al 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the blue BCF-12 and the green BCF-60 (Saint-Gobain Crystals, Nemours Cedex, France) temperature coefficients of 20.15 6 0.01 and 20.55 6 0.04% K 21 , respectively, were observed. 53 These values show that careful consideration should be taken for clinical measurements. A group at the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (Houston, TX) has also reported significant differences between measurements from detectors inserted inside the patients and those in anthropomorphic phantoms, owing to the temperature dependence of the PSDs.…”
Section: 49mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9 Small dependence to temperature has also been reported with a small decrease of the plastic scintillator light output with increasing temperature. [10][11][12] This temperature dependence is an important consideration for a detector dedicated to in vivo dosimetry. Nevertheless, it becomes negligible in a temperature-controlled environment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%