2016
DOI: 10.1002/2015gb005272
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Temperature influence on phytoplankton community growth rates

Abstract: A large database of field estimates of phytoplankton community growth rates in natural populations was compiled and analyzed to determine the apparent temperature effect on phytoplankton community growth rate. We conducted an ordinary least squares regression to optimize the parameters in two commonly used growth-temperature relations (Arrhenius and Q 10 models). Both equations fit the observational data equally with the optimized parameter values. The optimum apparent Q 10 value was 1.47 ± 0.08 (95% confidenc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
74
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
5
74
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The data analysis in this work represents the strongest evidence to date for a global temperature dependence of the attenuation of the POC flux in the open ocean. The range of Q 10 values to which we could constrain the temperature parameter are close to values used for phytoplankton growth and bacteria (typically between 1.5 and 2.2) [ Eppley , ; White et al , ; Bissinger et al , ; Sherman et al , ]. Our results confirm and extend attempts from previous authors to estimate the relationship between temperature and remineralization using a variety of approaches.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…The data analysis in this work represents the strongest evidence to date for a global temperature dependence of the attenuation of the POC flux in the open ocean. The range of Q 10 values to which we could constrain the temperature parameter are close to values used for phytoplankton growth and bacteria (typically between 1.5 and 2.2) [ Eppley , ; White et al , ; Bissinger et al , ; Sherman et al , ]. Our results confirm and extend attempts from previous authors to estimate the relationship between temperature and remineralization using a variety of approaches.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…It may suffice to say here that higher E values of net growth rates simply mean higher temperature sensitivity, that is, a higher positive or negative value indicates that the increase or decrease in μ net per °C is greater. Expressed as Q 10 values, our results ranged from −4.24 to 7.71 for phytoplankton loss in September and gain in March, respectively, with an overall mean value of 1.43 ± 0.40 SE, not significantly different from a global estimate of the temperature dependence of phytoplankton growth rates in situ (1.47, Sherman et al ., ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…with a q 10 value of 1.5 (Sherman et al, 2016), T being the ambient ocean temperature (in K), and T 0 the reference temperature of 303.15 K. The photosynthetic growth rate, P F (in mmol C m −3 s −1 ), can finally be determined as follows:…”
Section: Growth Ratementioning
confidence: 99%