1996
DOI: 10.1021/la960345o
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Temperature Effects on the Interactions between EHEC and SDS in Dilute Aqueous Solutions. Steady-State Fluorescence Quenching and Equilibrium Dialysis Investigations

Abstract: The interaction between the hydrophobic, nonionic cellulose derivative ethyl hydroxyethyl cellulose (EHEC; fraction CST-103) and the anionic surfactant sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) has been studied as a function of temperature from 20 to 50 °C in dilute aqueous solutions, i.e. a polymer concentration slightly below the critical overlap concentration (c*) and a surfactant concentration up to three times the normal critical micelle concentration (cmc). Methods utilized in this investigation include equilibrium d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
56
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
8
56
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The curve for SDS/HPC system has the same shape that was reported without salt 33 changing the maximum position to lower SDS concentration due to increase of the ionic strength. 34 In addition, the maximum viscosity at 4 × 10 -3 mol L -1 is also close to the value observed for SDS/ethyl(hydroxyethyl)cellulose systems independently of the polymer concentration. 1,14,35 The occurrence of the maximum viscosity above C 1 can be attributed to the formation of interchain polymersurfactant complexes.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 73%
“…The curve for SDS/HPC system has the same shape that was reported without salt 33 changing the maximum position to lower SDS concentration due to increase of the ionic strength. 34 In addition, the maximum viscosity at 4 × 10 -3 mol L -1 is also close to the value observed for SDS/ethyl(hydroxyethyl)cellulose systems independently of the polymer concentration. 1,14,35 The occurrence of the maximum viscosity above C 1 can be attributed to the formation of interchain polymersurfactant complexes.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 73%
“…The discussion concerning the dynamic surface tension is extended and related to some of the characterization parameters. Some differences in the molecular structure among the samples well known from earlier studies (3,8) are confirmed by surface tension measurements. Furthermore, some important experimental aspects of surface tension measurements by the pendant drop method are discussed.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…This was explained by the block-like distribution of the substitution of CST-103 and the formation of quite dense and tightly packed mixed micelles. CST-103 is also known to self-aggregate in water solutions (8). The reason for the comparatively high surface tension of the low concentration regime of CST-103, the long lag time, and the large decrease in surface tension at the high concentration regime is possibly this tendency toward self-aggregation.…”
Section: Surface Tension and Distribution Of Substituentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the intensity of I 1 is stronger in polar conditions and the intensity of I 3 in non-polar conditions, the I 1 /I 3 ratio is used as a micropolarity index [23,25,26], which will indicate the polarity in the micellar core and the degree of probe solubilized by the micelles. The Na ?…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%