2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.115405
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Temperature-dependent energy gain of bifacial PV farms: A global perspective

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In all cases, the systems were assumed to be oriented towards the south and with a 35 • inclination, similar to the experiments, and because this is the tilt angle to achieve the maximum annual energy yield. Figure 8 reports the relative bifacial gain, defined as BG = 100• EY bif − EY mono EY mono (4) where EY stands for energy yield, according to the temperature profile of Catania in 2017. Two cases were considered: the case of the three-cell minimodule installed at an average height of 55 cm, as in Figure 1 and for the experiments here reported (blue curve), and the case of a string of 6 modules of 72 cells (6 cells high and 12 cells wide) of 1 m × 2 m arranged in a 2 × 3 configuration (2 modules high and 3 modules wide), installed at an average height of 2 m (red curve).…”
Section: Model Extrapolations To Annual Pv Energy Yield and Effect Of...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In all cases, the systems were assumed to be oriented towards the south and with a 35 • inclination, similar to the experiments, and because this is the tilt angle to achieve the maximum annual energy yield. Figure 8 reports the relative bifacial gain, defined as BG = 100• EY bif − EY mono EY mono (4) where EY stands for energy yield, according to the temperature profile of Catania in 2017. Two cases were considered: the case of the three-cell minimodule installed at an average height of 55 cm, as in Figure 1 and for the experiments here reported (blue curve), and the case of a string of 6 modules of 72 cells (6 cells high and 12 cells wide) of 1 m × 2 m arranged in a 2 × 3 configuration (2 modules high and 3 modules wide), installed at an average height of 2 m (red curve).…”
Section: Model Extrapolations To Annual Pv Energy Yield and Effect Of...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, the BF ranges between 70% and 100% depending on the technology (PERC, PERT, HJT, etc., see [2,3]). Among the HJT cells, the n-type ones are the most promising for BPV, due to their high short-circuit current (I sc ), open-circuit voltage (V oc ), and BF, and for their low temperature coefficient [4] compared with the most common p-type cells [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The PV panel temperature mainly depends on the environmental conditions such as sky temperature, wind speed, module construction, technology-specific (monofacial or bifacial cells) and thermal coefficient of maximum power. Temperature dependence plays an important role in assessing site-specific energy gain outcomes around the world [17]. Therefore, proper location for installing the PV system should be carefully chosen [18].…”
Section: Factors Affecting Bifacial Pv Module Gainmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2) Bifacial solar cells accept light from the front and rear side and, hence, capture a higher portion of diffuse irradiance and ground reflected irradiance (albedo), thus increasing output [7]. This has motivated research in various directions for bifacial cells, ranging from mismatch loss estimation [8], single-axis tracking [9], [10], modeling [11] to field studies [12]. Furthermore, it has been shown that the spectral dependence of albedo also strongly influences the output [13]- [15].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%