1975
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.12.3473
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Temperature dependence of Frenkel-defect formation energy deduced from diffusion of sodium in silver chloride

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
11
0

Year Published

1976
1976
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
3
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We also calculated the diffusion coefficient of Naf in AgCl using our calculated formation energies, the calculated value for the migration energy of Na+ in AgCl, AuNa+(T), and the constant value of sF (4.72 k) that fits the conductivity. As shown in figure 4 the results agree excellently with Batra and Slifkin's experimental values [44]. I should ,perhaps comment on the constancy of s, with T. At first one might expect that if u, depends on T, so much s, through the thermodynamical relation to the dilemma appears to be that the temperaturedependent defect formation energy calculated from the HADES program in the quasiharmonic approximation is not a thermodynamical enthalpy, since it results from a minimization of the potential energy of the crystal rather than its free energy.…”
Section: Determination Of Diffusion Coefficients By Nmrsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…We also calculated the diffusion coefficient of Naf in AgCl using our calculated formation energies, the calculated value for the migration energy of Na+ in AgCl, AuNa+(T), and the constant value of sF (4.72 k) that fits the conductivity. As shown in figure 4 the results agree excellently with Batra and Slifkin's experimental values [44]. I should ,perhaps comment on the constancy of s, with T. At first one might expect that if u, depends on T, so much s, through the thermodynamical relation to the dilemma appears to be that the temperaturedependent defect formation energy calculated from the HADES program in the quasiharmonic approximation is not a thermodynamical enthalpy, since it results from a minimization of the potential energy of the crystal rather than its free energy.…”
Section: Determination Of Diffusion Coefficients By Nmrsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…We also demonstrate that by using this calculated temperature-dependent Frenkel defect energy together with the mobility parameters determined experimentally by Friauf and Aboagye (1975) and the association parameters peculiar to a particular crystal (Corish and Jacobs 1972) we can account very nicely for the entire experimental conductivity curve. In 0 4 we calculate the activation energy for the diffusion of a sodium ion impurity through silver chloride by the vacancy mechanism and show that values calculated for the sodium ion diffusion coefficient using this mobility and our theoretical vacancy concentrations agree very well with the values obtained by Batra and Slifkin (1975) over the entire temperature range in which their measurements were made. The defect mobility parameters calculated for the transport of the silver ion are, on the other hand, uniformly too high and we speculate that this may be due to ion deformation, as suggested by Kleppmann and Bilz (1976).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…Further evidence for the anomalous behaviour in silver chloride (on the basis of conventional models) at least in the last 150 K below the melting point, comes from the data on the diffusion of Na' impurity in the crystal obtained by Batra and Slifkin (1975). They found a non-linear Arrhenius plot for the diffusion process which had been shown earlier (Siiptitz 1965) to occur by a vacancy mechanism.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…These include rapid increases in dielectric constants, 8 large decreases in the elastic moduli, [9][10][11] large increases in thermal expansion [12][13][14] and ionic conductivity, [15][16][17][18][19] a strong dependence of the long wavelength absorption edge on temperature, 20,21 and continuous curvature in the Arrhenius plots of the diffusion coefficient of Na and K in AgBr and AgCl. 22,23 These anomalous changes are associated with a rapid increase in the concentration of Frenkel defects that are formed at high temperatures because of a temperaturedependent decrease in the Gibbs free energy for defect formation. 15,20,25 The Frenkel defect concentration at the melting point has been estimated to be between 0.2 and 0.7 % in AgCl, 15,24 and between 1.5 and 4 % ͑probably an overestimate͒ in AgBr.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%