1989
DOI: 10.1016/0921-5093(89)90668-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Temperature dependence of amorphization and precipitation processes in Ni+- and N+-implanted NixTi1−x alloys

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

1992
1992
1996
1996

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[11]. These activation energies, however, are similar in magnitude to activation energies previously reported for irradiation-enhanced epitaxial recrystallization in other materials [9,12].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…[11]. These activation energies, however, are similar in magnitude to activation energies previously reported for irradiation-enhanced epitaxial recrystallization in other materials [9,12].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The activation energies determined for Stage II recovery are 0.12 + 0.02 eV and 0.09 ± 0.02 eV for the 1. irradiation-produced defects, although the relative concentrations are different. These activation energies are also similar in magnitude to activation energies previously reported for 3-SiC [7] and for irradiation-enhanced recovery processes in other materials [11][12][13][14]. Based on the activation energies, Ea, and intercepts, C, determined for the Stage II data, Tc in ct-SiC is estimated to be 295 K under 2 MeV electron irradiation and 485 K under 1.5 MeV Xe t irradiation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…This annealing process competes with irradiation-induced amorphization and dominates above Tc, thus preventing amorphization. A temperature dependence study of amorphization in Ni+-and N+-implanted NixTil-x alloys has revealed two very similar processes with distinct activation energies occurring at low and high temperature regimes, respectively [18]. In the case of zircon, the activation energy associated with irradiation-enhanced epitaxial recrystallization, 0.31 eV, is r-nearly identical to an earlier measurement, 0.30 eV, [13]; however, it is considerably less than _: the activation energy for fission fragment track annealing (epitaxial recrystallization) in zircon, _: 3.6 eV [19], and the activation energy for the b_'k recrystallization of fully amorphous zircon, =_' 5.1 eV [7].…”
Section: And Discussion mentioning
confidence: 99%