2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0191-8869(00)00084-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Temperament and attention in the self-regulation of 7-year-old children

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

8
38
0
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
8
38
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Gerardi-Caulton (2000) found the performance in a spatial conflict task was related to this higher order EC factor. Similar findings linking parent-reported temperament EC to performance on laboratory attention tasks have been shown with 24-, 30-, and 36-month-olds , 3-and 5-year-olds (Chang & Burns, 2005), and 7-yearolds (González, Fuentes, Carranza, & Estévez, 2001).…”
Section: Individualitysupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Gerardi-Caulton (2000) found the performance in a spatial conflict task was related to this higher order EC factor. Similar findings linking parent-reported temperament EC to performance on laboratory attention tasks have been shown with 24-, 30-, and 36-month-olds , 3-and 5-year-olds (Chang & Burns, 2005), and 7-yearolds (González, Fuentes, Carranza, & Estévez, 2001).…”
Section: Individualitysupporting
confidence: 79%
“…This was expected given the fact that EC and behavioral measures of IS are usually correlated (Checa et al, 2008;Ellis et al, 2004;Rothbart & Rueda, 2005). Numerous empirical data (Checa et al, 2008;Ellis et al, 2004;Gerardi-Caulton, 2000;Gonzalez et al, 2001) have supported the relationship between temperamental EC and the functional efficiency of the executive attention network mostly measured through performance of tasks involving IS. This type of evidence has been previously used to argue that the executive attention network is the neural circuit supporting EC (Rothbart & Rueda, 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, there is no absolute consensus among the different authors regarding the corresponding construct-task. For example, the WCST has been considered by some authors as an inhibition task and by others as a shifting task (Diamond, 2013;Garon et al, 2008); TOL has been identified by different researchers as an inhibition, working memory or planning task (Berg & Byrd, 2002;Huizinga et al, 2006;Welsh, Satterlee-Cartmell, & Stine, 1999); the Stroop test has been described as an inhibition or an attention control task (Diamond, 2013;Espy & Bull, 2005;Franco-de-Lima, Pinheiro-Travaini, SalgadoAzoni, & Ciasca, 2012;Gonzalez, Fuentes, Carranza, & Estevez, 2001).…”
Section: Theoretical and Methodological Difficulties In The Establishmentioning
confidence: 99%