Telepsychiatry in intellectual disability psychiatry: literature review

Abstract

Aims and MethodThe aims of this review were to explore the effectiveness and patient and provider acceptability of telepsychiatry consultations in intellectual disability, contrasting this with direct face-to-face consultations and proposing avenues for further research and innovation. Computerised searches of databases including AMED and EMBASE were conducted.ResultsFour USA studies of intellectual disability telepsychiatry services have been reported. The majority (75%) focused on children with intellectual disability. Sample sizes ranged from 38 to 900 participants, with follow-up from 1 to 6 years. Outcome measures varied considerably and included cost savings to patients and healthcare providers, patient and carer satisfaction and new diagnoses.Clinical implicationsThe innovations summarised suggest a requirement to further explore telepsychiatry models. Despite some promising outcomes, there is a relative dearth in the existing literature. Further studies in other healthcare systems are required before concluding that telepsychiatry in intellectual disability is the best approach for providing psychiatric services to this population.Declaration of interestNone.

Psychological eHealth interventions for people with intellectual disabilities: A scoping review

“…So, the current situation provides valuable insights into relevant aspects for delivering eHealth interventions to people with intellectual disabilities directly. In a review of telepsychiatry among people with intellectual disabilities in a psychiatric setting, Madhavan ( 2019 ) concluded that it constituted an effective means through which to empower people with intellectual disabilities, while, simultaneously, reducing costs.…”

Telemedicine Treatment and Care for Patients with Intellectual Disability

“…These studies present several limitations: terms like “telemedicine”, “telehealth” and “e-health” are often used interchangeably for a broad range of support services and technologies, different aims and interventions, small sample size and different type of selection procedure, different age range of patients, poor protocols for a randomized controlled trial, compliance level of parents or caregivers, different use of the assistive products, different internet broadband services. It is therefore difficult to draw firm conclusions about the benefits and limitations of such a modality in people with intellectual disabilities [ 52 , 53 ].…”

Riesgos de discriminación por discapacidad en la digitalización de la asistencia sanitaria

“…La aplicación de telemedicina de forma generalizada precisa atención a las barreras en la legislación en lo que se refiere a los estándares de accesibilidad y los plazos recogidos en estas legislaciones para implementarlos (Annaswamy et al, 2020). En Reino Unido, por ejemplo, se ha incluido en algunos planes de salud para las personas con discapacidad intelectual en el proceso de envejecimiento, que la telemedicina solo será un com-plemento a las consultas presenciales y en ningún caso sustituirá a estas (Madhavan, 2019).…”