Teetering on the Edge of Legal Nihilism: Russia and the Evolving European Human Rights Regime

Abstract

From Pussy Riot to Michael Khodorkovskiy, the solidity of the rule of law in Russia seems rather shaky. This has translated into a troubled relationship between Russia and the European Court of Human Rights since Russia's ratification of the European Convention in 1998. Various factors explain this tension, including the structure of the judiciary, the status of the European Convention in Russia law, public mistrust of the courts, and ongoing episodes of armed conflicts. This has posed enormous challenges to the European Court of Human Rights, and even the most recent attempts to improve it are unlikely to trigger better compliance in Russia."Without exaggeration, Russia is a country of legal nihilism. No European country can boast of such disregard for law." 1 -Dmitry Medvedev, 22 January 2008

Backlash against international courts: explaining the forms and patterns of resistance to international courts

“…This can happen, for instance, when a respondent state before the international human rights courts pays the compensation to the victims of human rights violations, but continues the practice of said human rights violation. This has been the case in Russia, for example (Provost, 2015).…”

The State of Legal Consciousness Formation of Russian Students

“…The State of Legal Consciousness Formation of Russian … International Journal of Instruction, April 2020 • Vol.13, No.2 the correction of various types of deformations of legal consciousness currently dominating in Russian society: legal idealism (Lisdiyono, 2018), legal infantilism, rebirth of legal consciousness, legal nihilism (Provost, 2015;Runchman, 2014).…”

Culture and corruption: An experimental comparison of cultural patterns on the corruption propensity in Poland and Russia

“…It traces back from Tsarist Russia, which was characterized by a low degree of formal codification of the law and an arbitrary interpretation within judicial system, over the Soviet era and into the present day. The normative acceptance of Legal Nihilism was thereby supported by its embedding in the Russian cultural-philosophical discourse and its literary anchoring (Mehlich, 2020) and is still expressed de facto today in the implementation of international legal norms in Russia (Provost, 2015). Although Hendley (2012) showed – based on survey data – that Legal Nihilist attitudes lose prevalence in Russia, nearly a quarter of the respondents adhere to nihilist views in addition to 18.99% ambivalent respondents.…”