1980
DOI: 10.1007/bf00160738
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tectonic landforms and quaternary tectonics in Japan

Abstract: The study of tectonic landforms is one of the main themes of geomophological research in Japan, characterized as a tectonically active area along the subducting oceanic plates. The recent trends in the studies of tectonic landforms which include an arrangement or distribution of major ranges and plains, vertical displacement of low-relief erosion surfaces and of marine terraces, and various kinds of deformed features due to active faulting or folding, are introduced here with special reference to the Quaternar… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1980
1980
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 23 publications
(26 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A subdivision of coastal geomorphology may therefore be suitable to show the local differences of uplift and subsidence, eventhough it is said that the velocity of tectonic movement during the Quaternary period does not show so great difference in Japan. According to the Research Group for Quarternary Tectonic Map (1969Map ( , 1973, the amounts of uplift and subsidence are distributed as shown in Fig 3 of Ota's paper in this issue (Ota, 1980). If we compare this figure with Fig 1 of the present paper, it is clearly seen that the amount of uplift is great in the regions of mountain ranges and, on the contrary, the amount of subsidence is great in the regions of basins or bays.…”
Section: Geological and Geomorphological Regionsmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…A subdivision of coastal geomorphology may therefore be suitable to show the local differences of uplift and subsidence, eventhough it is said that the velocity of tectonic movement during the Quaternary period does not show so great difference in Japan. According to the Research Group for Quarternary Tectonic Map (1969Map ( , 1973, the amounts of uplift and subsidence are distributed as shown in Fig 3 of Ota's paper in this issue (Ota, 1980). If we compare this figure with Fig 1 of the present paper, it is clearly seen that the amount of uplift is great in the regions of mountain ranges and, on the contrary, the amount of subsidence is great in the regions of basins or bays.…”
Section: Geological and Geomorphological Regionsmentioning
confidence: 64%