New Frontiers in Tectonic Research - At the Midst of Plate Convergence 2011
DOI: 10.5772/22295
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tectonic Escape Mechanism in the Crustal Evolution of Eastern Anatolian Region (Turkey)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
(67 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The uplifting of the Central Taurides during the late Tertiary was closely associated with mountainbuilding processes in a collided continental collision zone. The collision of Africa-Arabia to the south and Eurasia to the north caused high uplift in eastern Anatolia, whereas the Anatolide-Tauride platform underwent an extensional collapse during the Oligocene-early Miocene (Şengör and Yılmaz, 1981;Şengör, 1985;Şengör et al, 1985Dewey et al, 1986;Jolivet and Faccenna, 2000;Aksu et al, 2005b;Bozkurt and Mittwede, 2005;Ring et al, 2010;Elitok and Dolmaz, 2011). The late Miocene of the region witnessed a high uplift of the mountain belt and subsidence in the foreland as a result of the slab break-off and/or the slab tear within the subducted slab beneath this region (Cosentino et al, 2012;Schildgen et al, 2012aSchildgen et al, , 2012bSchildgen et al, , 2014Cipollari et al, 2013) (Figure 7).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The uplifting of the Central Taurides during the late Tertiary was closely associated with mountainbuilding processes in a collided continental collision zone. The collision of Africa-Arabia to the south and Eurasia to the north caused high uplift in eastern Anatolia, whereas the Anatolide-Tauride platform underwent an extensional collapse during the Oligocene-early Miocene (Şengör and Yılmaz, 1981;Şengör, 1985;Şengör et al, 1985Dewey et al, 1986;Jolivet and Faccenna, 2000;Aksu et al, 2005b;Bozkurt and Mittwede, 2005;Ring et al, 2010;Elitok and Dolmaz, 2011). The late Miocene of the region witnessed a high uplift of the mountain belt and subsidence in the foreland as a result of the slab break-off and/or the slab tear within the subducted slab beneath this region (Cosentino et al, 2012;Schildgen et al, 2012aSchildgen et al, , 2012bSchildgen et al, , 2014Cipollari et al, 2013) (Figure 7).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The neotectonic evolution of Turkey is controlled by the collision of the African and Arabian plates with the Eurasian plate along the Hellenic (Aegean) arc, and the Bitlis-Zagros suture zone (Elitok and Dolmaz, 2011). The Bitlis-Zagros suture zone extends to the Alpine-Appenine mountain belt and the Owen transform fault.…”
Section: Tectonic Evolution Of the Regionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Bitlis-Pütürge thrust zone and the eastern Anatolian high plateau are parts of the oceanic and continental crust that were compressed and shortened by the interaction of the Arabian and Eurasian plates. Strong strike-slip faults on the right-lateral NAFZ and the left-lateral EAFZ, which intersect at Karlıova, contribute to the westward tectonic escape of the Anatolian plate in conjunction with this collision and contraction zone (Elitok and Dolmaz 2011). The region where these two tectonic belts meet is the area of greatest stress in relation to plate movements in Turkey.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%