1987
DOI: 10.4095/130300
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tectonic assemblage map of the Canadian Cordillera and adjacent parts of the United States of America

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

3
81
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 98 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
81
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To test the sensitivity of the mass balance to the selected value of ␦ 34 S pyr , we performed the calculations using different values of ␦ 34 S pyr (Ϫ10‰ and 0‰ CDT ), which respectively apportion 61 and 81% of the riverine sulfate to sulfide oxidation, 33 and 14% to gypsum dissolution, with 5% coming from atmospheric deposition. Based on the studies of Taylor (2004) and Taylor and Beaudoin, 2000), the fact that no evaporite deposits have been mapped within the watersheds considered by this study (Wheeler and McFeely, 1991), and constraints imposed by carbon isotope systematics (described further on), we conclude that the average isotopic composition of sulfides in the study area must be closer to 0‰ CDT and therefore that 81% of the sulfate in the rivers originates from sulfide weathering. For rivers where the ␦ 34 S SO4 is more negative than 0‰ CDT , it is assumed that all non-atmospheric sulfate in these rivers can be attributed to pyrite oxidation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 92%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…To test the sensitivity of the mass balance to the selected value of ␦ 34 S pyr , we performed the calculations using different values of ␦ 34 S pyr (Ϫ10‰ and 0‰ CDT ), which respectively apportion 61 and 81% of the riverine sulfate to sulfide oxidation, 33 and 14% to gypsum dissolution, with 5% coming from atmospheric deposition. Based on the studies of Taylor (2004) and Taylor and Beaudoin, 2000), the fact that no evaporite deposits have been mapped within the watersheds considered by this study (Wheeler and McFeely, 1991), and constraints imposed by carbon isotope systematics (described further on), we conclude that the average isotopic composition of sulfides in the study area must be closer to 0‰ CDT and therefore that 81% of the sulfate in the rivers originates from sulfide weathering. For rivers where the ␦ 34 S SO4 is more negative than 0‰ CDT , it is assumed that all non-atmospheric sulfate in these rivers can be attributed to pyrite oxidation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Even though there are no mapped evaporite deposits within this watershed, it is possible that gypsum is present within the Paleozoic passive margin sediments of the Foreland Belt (the headwater regions of the Fraser watershed). Dolomites are common within these sediments (Wheeler and McFeely, 1991). Modern dolomites are known to form in sabkha plains such as around the Persian Gulf.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations