2004
DOI: 10.1016/s1367-9120(03)00155-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tectonic and stratigraphic evolution of the Sarulla graben geothermal area, North Sumatra, Indonesia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(a) Comparison of reliable Sumatran Fault geological slip rates [ Hickman et al ., ; Ito et al ., ; this study] with the predicted slip rate variation estimated from block modeling and a local frictional balance model. The geological and geodetic slip rates are most compatible with a uniform slip rate model, implying that the Sumatran fore arc has not undergone significant trench‐parallel stretching during at least the last 100 kyr.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(a) Comparison of reliable Sumatran Fault geological slip rates [ Hickman et al ., ; Ito et al ., ; this study] with the predicted slip rate variation estimated from block modeling and a local frictional balance model. The geological and geodetic slip rates are most compatible with a uniform slip rate model, implying that the Sumatran fore arc has not undergone significant trench‐parallel stretching during at least the last 100 kyr.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because the Sunda megathrust and Sumatran Fault together accommodate nearly the full budget of oblique plate convergence, the Mentawai Fault and other steeply dipping, trench-parallel fore-arc faults do not have Figure 11. (a) Comparison of reliable Sumatran Fault geological slip rates [Hickman et al, 2004;Ito et al, 2012; this study] with the predicted slip rate variation estimated from block modeling and a local frictional balance model. The geological and geodetic slip rates are most compatible with a uniform slip rate model, implying that the Sumatran fore arc has not undergone significant trench-parallel stretching during at least the last 100 kyr.…”
Section: Fore-arc Rheology and Fault Strengthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The emplacement of magmatic bodies at shallower crustal levels (Pertusati et al 1993;Rossetti et al 1999;Acocella and Rossetti 2002;Dini et al 2005) can produce temperature increases in the host rocks and stimulate the convection of hot fluids, both giving rise to localised heat-flow anomalies (Barbier 2002). Important examples of geothermal areas occurring in extensional settings are the geothermal fields of Yellowstone (Eaton et al 1975, Morgan et al 1977Lucchitta 1990), northern California (Younker et al 1982), the Pannonic Basin (Ravnik et al 1995), the Rhine Graben (Werner and Kahle 1980;Brun et al 1992), the Indonesian Sarulla Graben (Hickman et al 2004) and Taupo Volcanic Zone (Evison et al 1976, Wood 1992Spinks et al 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other volcanic areas host calderas (as Ranau caldera; Bellier and Sébrier, 1994;Natawidjaja et al, 2017), stratovolcanoes (between 600 and 3800 m high), domes and geothermal activity (Gasparon, 2005). The latter includes the Sarulla graben (Hickman et al, 2004) and the Tarutung and Silangkitang geothermal areas, where the fluid pathways are related to pull-aparts (Muksin et al, 2013(Muksin et al, , 2014, negative flowers (Nukman and Moeck, 2013) and subvertical (Moore et al, 2001) splays of the GSF. In the latter case, the geothermal reservoir appears centered along the fault zone, where the highly fractured and hydrothermally altered rocks serve as main conduits for vertical fluid flow from deeper magmatic sources (Moore et al, 2001).…”
Section: Tectonic Setting Of Sumatramentioning
confidence: 99%