2011 37th EUROMICRO Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications 2011
DOI: 10.1109/seaa.2011.66
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

TechSuRe - A Method for Assessing Technology Sustainability in Long Lived Software Intensive Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…He proposes several quality characteristics such as maintainability, portability, modifiability and evolvability as essential NFRs for longliving software systems. Likewise, Jansen et al (2011) pay attention to the economic dimension and present a method to assess the sustainability of long-lived software-intensive systems. Their TechSuRe method defines sustainability in terms of risk and how software can stay economically viable over its entire life cycle.…”
Section: Sustainability Into Software Projectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…He proposes several quality characteristics such as maintainability, portability, modifiability and evolvability as essential NFRs for longliving software systems. Likewise, Jansen et al (2011) pay attention to the economic dimension and present a method to assess the sustainability of long-lived software-intensive systems. Their TechSuRe method defines sustainability in terms of risk and how software can stay economically viable over its entire life cycle.…”
Section: Sustainability Into Software Projectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…),Jansen et al (2011),Kocak (2013),Calero et al (2013a),Venters et al (2014a) andKoçak et al (2015), have focussed on the environmental and/or economic dimension(s) of sustainabilityalso known as green softwareand have paid almost no attention to the social dimension. On the other hand, other contributions, such asNaumann et al (2011), …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such a preliminary encoding is done through the ontology discussed in Section IV. A similar approach is adopted in [11], where the authors address the management of risk knowledge related to technology sustainability, and create a corresponding ontology for encoding sustainability risks.…”
Section: B Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sustainability risk is estimated in [1] by considering nine indicators: lifetime in production, lifetime, competence risk, technology evolution risk, risk of changing business model, market risk, lifetime certainty, complexity risk and technology evolution fitness. The output of the assessment is an indication of the expected lifetime of the technology"s sustainability.…”
Section: Sustainability Risksmentioning
confidence: 99%