Technology spillover and innovation

Nie, Pu‐yan; Wang, Chan; Wen, Hong‐xing

doi:10.1080/09537325.2021.1893294

Cited by 29 publications

(10 citation statements)

References 40 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Other than that, the commercialization risk of transferring R&D achievements into the mass production process must not be ignored. Manufacturing enterprises that engaged in green innovation activities need to invest large amounts of R&D capital and take huge risks, but it is impossible for them to reap the full benefits due to the positive externalities of green innovation, while other competitors can replicate or enjoy the company's innovations at a lower cost [35]. As a result, the motivation for green innovation is reduced and some reasonable and effective green innovation projects are abandoned to avoid the R&D risks and "free-rider" behavior of other enterprises.…”

Section: Government Subsidies and Green Innovationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Promote Green Innovation in Manufacturing Enterprises in the Aspect of Government Subsidies in China

Tang

2022

IJERPH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Green innovation is vital for manufacturing enterprises to achieve a balance between economic, environmental and social benefits. This paper empirically investigates the mechanisms of government subsidies, R&D investment and public participatory environmental regulation on green innovation in manufacturing enterprises, selecting a sample of 1308 manufacturing firms listed on Chinese A-shares from 2010–2019. The results show that government subsidies can significantly promote green innovation in manufacturing enterprises, with private enterprises being more pronounced. R&D investment plays a mediating role in green innovation in manufacturing enterprises, while public participatory environmental regulation has a negative impact. The moderating effect of public participatory environmental regulation on government subsidies is different on different green patents, with a more negative effect on green invention patents than on green utility model patents. Public participatory environmental regulation has a negative moderating effect on the green innovation of state-owned manufacturing enterprises while having no significant effect on private manufacturing enterprises.

show abstract

Section: Government Subsidies and Green Innovationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Promote Green Innovation in Manufacturing Enterprises in the Aspect of Government Subsidies in China

Tang

2022

IJERPH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…There is a new trend that firms utilize external resources for cooperative research (Chesbrough, 2006 ; Nie P-. Y. et al, 2022 ). Besides, firms tend to cooperate with universities and scientific research institutes instead of internal R&D activities to reduce technology transaction costs and increase innovation efficiency (Caloghirou et al, 2021 ).…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 97%

“…In recent years, due to the increase in technological complexity and novelty in innovation activities (Barbieri et al, 2020), it is hard for firms to achieve technology breakthroughs by themselves. There is a new trend that firms utilize external resources for cooperative research (Chesbrough, 2006;Nie P-. Y. et al, 2022).…”

Section: Heterogeneous Knowledge Spillover Channels In Universities A...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Heterogeneous knowledge spillover channels in universities and green technology innovation in local firms: Stimulating quantity or quality?

Nie

Gong²,

Zhao³

et al. 2022

Front. Psychol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Sluggish status of green technology development has stimulated research into new incentives and pathways. Beyond the traditional regulatory-push and demand-pull approaches, we reposition the strength of the technology push. Based on the innovation diffusion theory, a multidimensional path model of knowledge spillover in universities is constructed, and the impact of heterogeneous knowledge spillover channels on green innovation activities of local firms is discussed. We find that R&D collaboration has a significant effect on local firms' quality but not the quantity of green innovation. Contrarily, patent citations and technology transfer have unequal positive effects on the quantity of green innovation of local firms, while there is no evidence that they can also improve the quality of green innovation. Despite regional disparities, strict environmental regulations are pushing companies to cite university patents in some regions. The university knowledge stock has largely contributed to both quantitative and qualitative advances in subsequent green innovation in local firms. Our conclusions provide a precise and objective evaluation of the impact mechanism of multiple knowledge spillover channels in universities on firms' green innovation, as well as a reference for the selection of the form of industry–university–research collaboration.

show abstract

“…This effect is intensified by fierce market competition, which further shortens the period in which innovators maintain a competitive advantage over their followers (Chen and Liu, 2019). Specifically, intense market competition decreases both innovators' profits and patent price, thus abating innovators' motivation to incorporate corporate innovation activities (Nie et al, 2021).…”

Section: Market Competition and Corporate Green Innovationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Market Competition, Financialization, and Green Innovation: Evidence From China’s Manufacturing Industries

Guo

Fan

Yuan

2022

Front. Environ. Sci.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Green innovation has become a critical measure to address the sustainable development challenges of manufacturing industries, and research has largely neglected the important role of managers as decision-makers within firms. Using a sample of China’s listed manufacturing firms from 2009 to 2019, this study explores the impact of market competition and financialization on corporate green innovation and examines the moderating effect of market competition. The main findings are as follows. First, intense market competition may inhibit corporate green innovation in the context of the Chinese market. Second, managers are willing to sacrifice firms’ long-term interests in exchange for profits in the short run. Third, market competition alleviates the negative association between financialization and corporate green innovation, indicating that the interactions between manufacturing firms may alter managers’ preferences for financial investment. In addition, our study explores heterogeneous impacts of market competition and financialization on corporate green innovation, and the empirical results are consistent with our findings in most cases. Our findings provide support for rational resource allocation in green innovation and can be used to guide manufacturing firms to achieve their goals of sustainable development.

show abstract

Technology spillover and innovation

Cited by 29 publications

References 40 publications

Promote Green Innovation in Manufacturing Enterprises in the Aspect of Government Subsidies in China

Promote Green Innovation in Manufacturing Enterprises in the Aspect of Government Subsidies in China

Heterogeneous knowledge spillover channels in universities and green technology innovation in local firms: Stimulating quantity or quality?

Market Competition, Financialization, and Green Innovation: Evidence From China’s Manufacturing Industries

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About