2011
DOI: 10.1007/s10676-011-9264-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Technology, capabilities and critical perspectives: what can critical theory contribute to Sen’s capability approach?

Abstract: This paper explores what insights can be drawn from critical theory to enrich and strengthen Sen's capability approach in relation to technology and human development. The two theories share some important commonalities: both are concerned with the pursuit of ''a good life''; both are normative theories rooted in ethics and meant to make a difference, and both are interested in democracy. The paper provides a brief overview of both schools of thought and their applications to technology and human development. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
60
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
(61 reference statements)
0
60
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These studies have drawn on the concepts of commodities, capabilities and functioning to shed light on the values of ICT and the process of assessing them from a development perspective (see Dasuki & Abbott, 2015;Hatakka & Lagsten, 2012;Klein, 2010). The other group examined various angles in which CA can shed light on discussions about design, social justice, and equality in IS (see Oosterlaken, 2009;Zheng & Stahl, 2011;Zheng, 2009). Despite the immense potential of CA, there has been a slow uptake in it as a theoretical basis for IS in developing countries research (Coelho et al, 2015).…”
Section: Capability Approach and Is In Developing Countriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These studies have drawn on the concepts of commodities, capabilities and functioning to shed light on the values of ICT and the process of assessing them from a development perspective (see Dasuki & Abbott, 2015;Hatakka & Lagsten, 2012;Klein, 2010). The other group examined various angles in which CA can shed light on discussions about design, social justice, and equality in IS (see Oosterlaken, 2009;Zheng & Stahl, 2011;Zheng, 2009). Despite the immense potential of CA, there has been a slow uptake in it as a theoretical basis for IS in developing countries research (Coelho et al, 2015).…”
Section: Capability Approach and Is In Developing Countriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the Functionings are achievements, the capabilities are the abilities to achieve them [17] Functionings are states of being and doing. It is what an individual is or is doing such as owning a mobile phone, transacting an e-service, being e-skilled, participating in elections, being malnutrition or being healthy.…”
Section: Exclusion Cyclementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these theories do not explain the mechanism of ICT use and effect in details, and ICT still remains as a "black box". The same can be said for research using the capability approach, where ICT often are regarded as neutral and as a commodity just like any other [9]. The question of why the same ICT with similar functionalities sometimes works and sometimes does not work still remains unanswered.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%