2021 4th International Conference on Education Technology Management 2021
DOI: 10.1145/3510309.3510335
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Technology-Assisted Problem-Based Learning against Common Problem-Based Learning in Cultivating Mathematical Critical Thinking Skills: A Meta-Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It shows that the overall effect size of all documents is located in the interval between the lowest effect size and the highest effect size. It interprets that there are no existing outliers of the collection of effect size in this meta-analysis study (Fuadi et al, 2021;Jaya & Suparman, 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…It shows that the overall effect size of all documents is located in the interval between the lowest effect size and the highest effect size. It interprets that there are no existing outliers of the collection of effect size in this meta-analysis study (Fuadi et al, 2021;Jaya & Suparman, 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Published studies statistically tended to have reported the results that were significant and were used in meta-analysis studies so that the bias of publication was able to occur [50], [51]. As a consequence, publication bias analysis had to be carried out.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Method employed to conduct this study was meta-analysis (Borenstein et al, 2009;Cumming, 2012). Random effect model was selected as the estimation model applied in this meta-analysis because the primary studies involved had the heterogeneous characteristics such as educational level, group size of intervention, geographical location, instrument, learning tool, and subject (Fuadi et al, 2021;Jaya & Suparman, 2021;Juandi, Kusumah, Tamur, Perbowo, & Tanu, 2021;Juandi, Kusumah, Tamur, Perbowo, Siagian, et al, 2021;Suparman, Juandi, & Tamur, 2021a. According to Cooper et al (2013) and Hunter and Schmidt (2004), there were seven steps conducted in the meta-analysis process.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%