Third International Handbook of Mathematics Education 2012
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4614-4684-2_19
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Technology and the Role of Proof: The Case of Dynamic Geometry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0
4

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
16
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Stacey and Wiliam (2013) state that dynamic geometry programs allow students to "demonstrate a wide range of abilities" (p. 745). It stands to reason that they could also be used to reveal a teacher's abilities to experiment, investigate, make and test hypotheses, and create proofs (Sinclair and Robutti 2013). Also, there is a body of literature which states that when the virtual manipulative is designed so that the users can explore it (e.g., move it, change its features and parameters), its users may achieve more than when using physical manipulatives, although for the largest effect, it is advisable to combine virtual and physical manipulatives in mathematics teaching (Moyer-Packenham and Westenskow 2013).…”
Section: Virtual Manipulatives As Special Mathematics Machines or Digmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stacey and Wiliam (2013) state that dynamic geometry programs allow students to "demonstrate a wide range of abilities" (p. 745). It stands to reason that they could also be used to reveal a teacher's abilities to experiment, investigate, make and test hypotheses, and create proofs (Sinclair and Robutti 2013). Also, there is a body of literature which states that when the virtual manipulative is designed so that the users can explore it (e.g., move it, change its features and parameters), its users may achieve more than when using physical manipulatives, although for the largest effect, it is advisable to combine virtual and physical manipulatives in mathematics teaching (Moyer-Packenham and Westenskow 2013).…”
Section: Virtual Manipulatives As Special Mathematics Machines or Digmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The teacher plays an important role in moderating and leading classroom discussion by identifying necessary prompts, providing promising inputs, or taking advantage of "hiccups" (Clark-Wilson, 2010). Sinclair and Robutti (2013) reported the essential role of the teacher in two case studies in which the teacher helped students to make links between dynamic representations and theoretical geometry.…”
Section: Communication and Collaboration Through And Of Technologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More research is needed on how other types of problems may or may not support the identification of the links between discursive apprehensions and the process of inferring new information about figures as a way of helping pre-service teachers construct essential relations between geometrical facts. Today, one Downloaded by [University of Massachusetts, Amherst] at 07:25 05 October 2014 particular new area of interest should be how configural reasoning is developed to solve geometrical proof problems in dynamic geometry environments, since these contexts can modify the learning of geometrical knowledge (Gómez-Chacón & Kuzniak, 2013;Sinclair & Robutti, 2013). In this context, it is possible that a conceptual control requiring explicit geometrical knowledge is needed to trigger configural reasoning.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%