Technology is available and accessible in many mathematics classrooms. Adopting technology to support teaching and learning requires teachers to change their teaching practices. This paper reports the responses of a diverse cohort of 92 secondary mathematics teachers who chose to respond to an Australian state-wide survey (Mathematics with Technology Perceptions Survey) developed using a Theory of Planned Behaviour framework. The items discussed in this paper targeted mathematics teachers' perceptions of possible barriers and enablers to their intention to use technology in their teaching. The responses are varied but, overall, strength of agreement with enablers outweighed agreement with perceived barriers. However, it is clear that despite an overall positive attitude towards the use of technology for teaching mathematics, some perceived barriers to change are notable. It is, therefore, helpful if those responsible for professional development, promoting the use of technology, recognise and address these barriers as well as working to strengthening enablers.

The active 2005 hurricane season alerted Americans to the pressing need for a more effective response to mass casualty incidents. The kidney patient community was particularly affected. Ninety-four dialysis facilities in the Gulf Coast states closed for at least 1 wk in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina, and additional units were affected by evacuation of dialysis patients. Dialysis units along the Gulf Coast were also affected by Hurricanes Rita and Wilma. Existing emergency response plans were inadequate in providing continuity of care for kidney patients. The Kashmir, South Asia, earthquake of October 2005 killed 97,000 individuals. Building collapse was associated with widespread crush injury, and many patients required temporary hemodialysis. Several regions of the United States have the potential for catastrophic earthquakes. The Kidney Community Emergency Response Coalition has recently issued recommendations for patients, dialysis facilities, and providers, with a goal to improve care of kidney patients in future domestic disasters. With suitable planning, the nephrology community can do much to ensure the continuity of medical care for kidney patients in the face of a wide range of possible natural and human-made disasters.

The catastrophic 2005 hurricane season alerted Americans to the need for a more effective response to mass casualty incidents. To address the needs of the nephrology community, the Kidney Community Emergency Response Coalition (KCERC) was formed, with representatives from more than 50 governmental agencies and private organizations. After completing phase 1 of its work, the KCERC issued recommendations for patients, dialysis units, and providers. During phase 2, the KCERC will promote implementation of those recommendations. During a disaster, the KCERC will host a daily conference call on which dialysis facilities, the End-Stage Renal Disease Networks, and emergency response officials will coordinate disaster response. Predisaster preparation for kidney patients should stress identification of alternative dialysis facilities, education about the renal emergency diet, and plans for early evacuation from the disaster area and for evacuating with medical documents and medications. Dialysis facilities are required to have a disaster plan; regular revision and rehearsal are essential. Critical issues for dialysis facilities include identification of partner facilities, a robust communications plan that takes into account the limitations of telephones and broadband access, staff shortages in the face of a possible influx of new patients, the delivery of service in the face of compromised utilities (water, power), and the recovery of a dialysis facility that experiences flooding or structural damage. A timeline to safety for dialysis patients can be visualized; if specific tasks are accomplished at each disaster stage, then it is likely that the health of these vulnerable patients can be protected.