2014
DOI: 10.19030/cier.v7i3.8638
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Technology And Online Education: Models For Change

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
(26 reference statements)
0
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a result, universities have shown a strong interest in how to increase student engagement, particularly given rising external pressures to improve learning outcomes and prepare students for academic success (Axelson & Flick, 2011;Kuh, 2009). There are various models of student engagement that identify factors that influence student engagement (Kahu, 2013;Lam et al, 2012;Nora et al, 2005;Wimpenny & Savin-Baden, 2013;Zepke & Leach, 2010); however, none include the overt role of technology despite the growing trend and student demands to integrate technology into the learning experience (Amirault, 2012;Cook & Sonnenberg, 2014;Revere & Kovach, 2011;Sun & Chen, 2016;Westera, 2015). Therefore, the primary purpose of our literature review was to explore whether technology influences student engagement.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As a result, universities have shown a strong interest in how to increase student engagement, particularly given rising external pressures to improve learning outcomes and prepare students for academic success (Axelson & Flick, 2011;Kuh, 2009). There are various models of student engagement that identify factors that influence student engagement (Kahu, 2013;Lam et al, 2012;Nora et al, 2005;Wimpenny & Savin-Baden, 2013;Zepke & Leach, 2010); however, none include the overt role of technology despite the growing trend and student demands to integrate technology into the learning experience (Amirault, 2012;Cook & Sonnenberg, 2014;Revere & Kovach, 2011;Sun & Chen, 2016;Westera, 2015). Therefore, the primary purpose of our literature review was to explore whether technology influences student engagement.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Surveys suggest that two-thirds of students use mobile devices for learning and believe that technology can help them achieve learning outcomes and better prepare them for a workforce that is increasingly dependent on technology (Chen, Seilhamer, Bennett, & Bauer, 2015;Dahlstrom, 2012). Universities that fail to effectively integrate technology into the learning experience miss opportunities to improve student outcomes and meet the expectations of a student body that has grown accustomed to the integration of technology into every facet of life (Amirault, 2012;Cook & Sonnenberg, 2014;Revere & Kovach, 2011;Sun & Chen, 2016;Westera, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Public colleges and universities in the U.S. had a 7.3 percent increase in online course enrollment between fall 2015 and 2016, while private nonprofit schools had a 7.1 percent increase. Internet and digital technologies such as electronic mail, Instant Messaging, Interactive video conferencing, mobile/smartphones, and social networks have dramatically transformed the way education is delivered (Cook & Sonnenberg, 2014;Friedman, 2018). Such new tools have enabled online delivery of course materials to students outside of brick-and-mortar classrooms in an asynchronous manner.…”
Section: Educational Leadership Doctoral Students' Perceptions Of Thementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Models of borderless online networks can be created by collaborative tools and their applications. Thus, the approach of borderless networks can create dynamic online learning opportunities [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%