2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.hlpt.2018.10.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Technology adoption potential of medical devices: The case of wearable sensor products for pervasive care in neurosurgery and orthopedics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One measuring tool to evaluate this changing scenario is investments made by venture capitalist in health-care startups (Garbuio and Lin, 2019). Typically, the following key factors determine the growth and sustainability of health care: integrated digital healthcare portfolio inclusive of drugs design, production and its supply chain (Bardy, 2019; Velthoven et al , 2019), health information technology and services and medical devices and sensors (Hogaboam and Daim, 2018); customer data management (including patient digital record keeping, its management and coordination) (Pramanik et al , 2019); digital healthcare data integration (across digital devices and social media, Web data, market data and interhospital) (Saheb and Izadi, 2019); and analytics and big data (Clim et al , 2018; Khennou et al , 2018; Saheb and Izadi, 2019). …”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One measuring tool to evaluate this changing scenario is investments made by venture capitalist in health-care startups (Garbuio and Lin, 2019). Typically, the following key factors determine the growth and sustainability of health care: integrated digital healthcare portfolio inclusive of drugs design, production and its supply chain (Bardy, 2019; Velthoven et al , 2019), health information technology and services and medical devices and sensors (Hogaboam and Daim, 2018); customer data management (including patient digital record keeping, its management and coordination) (Pramanik et al , 2019); digital healthcare data integration (across digital devices and social media, Web data, market data and interhospital) (Saheb and Izadi, 2019); and analytics and big data (Clim et al , 2018; Khennou et al , 2018; Saheb and Izadi, 2019). …”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…integrated digital healthcare portfolio inclusive of drugs design, production and its supply chain (Bardy, 2019; Velthoven et al , 2019), health information technology and services and medical devices and sensors (Hogaboam and Daim, 2018);…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, and despite all these conditions, the measurement of physical activity remains a challenge in the treatment, rehabilitation, and health promotion of patients with chronic non-oncological pain [131]. Physical activity monitoring devices have the potential to help clinicians in multiple novel pain applications, such as surgeon support tools to provide personalized post-operative care [317].…”
Section: Future Trends and Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A greater research and development effort in health technologies is necessary, both in private and public assistance models, including rural areas and taking into account the vision and needs of the pain-affected patients [317]. There is a need for new systems and applications for chronic pain self-control, incorporating the needs and context of the user, which would allow improving accessibility to treatment, and reducing economic costs and waiting times [314].…”
Section: Future Trends and Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the reasons behind this state, one could name the lack of knowledge on potential risks of emerging technologies or a general lack of risk management skills in smaller companies (Henschel and Durst, 2016). As the direct and indirect costs of implementing new technologies in companies are high (Rammel, 2003; Daim et al , 2006; Lee et al , 2018; Hogaboam and Daim, 2018), the adoption should be based on a well-thought-out strategic decision that takes into account both the potential benefits and risks for the organization (Köhler and Som, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%