The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2020
DOI: 10.1108/jpmd-03-2020-0028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Technological transformation, culinary tourism and stakeholder engagement: emerging trends from a systematic literature review

Abstract: Purpose This paper aims to pinpoint the technological transformation impact on food as the cultural phenomenon for destination brand identity and management as the novel approach for the stakeholder causal scope (SCS) analysis in culinary tourism. Thus, this paper attempts to answer the following research question: What is the role of technological transformation in addressing stakeholder engagement of culinary tourism? Design/methodology/approach The research is based on the systematic two-decade literature… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, the relevant data retrieved from this network analysis, in addition highlighting the key research constructs and streams, supported the identification and structuring of the content analysis section (Niñerola et al 2019 ; Schimperna et al 2021 ). These results highlight the potential role of the smart paradigm within cities and tourism destinations, also addressing other key subjects, such as sustainable development and technologies, particularly in tourist-oriented and tourism destination management studies.…”
Section: Bibliometric Analysismentioning
confidence: 66%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Finally, the relevant data retrieved from this network analysis, in addition highlighting the key research constructs and streams, supported the identification and structuring of the content analysis section (Niñerola et al 2019 ; Schimperna et al 2021 ). These results highlight the potential role of the smart paradigm within cities and tourism destinations, also addressing other key subjects, such as sustainable development and technologies, particularly in tourist-oriented and tourism destination management studies.…”
Section: Bibliometric Analysismentioning
confidence: 66%
“…One interesting fact is the modest relevance of the term “technology”, despite being a key element within both smart and digital paradigms. Nevertheless, and as in Schimperna et al ( 2021 ), this is not representative of the slight importance of technological tools in the studies, even because several technologies are visible in the network, e.g., the IoT, mobile applications, big data, information and communication technologies, blockchain. On the other hand, this might indicate future research paths, perhaps highlighting the role of specific technologies or establishing a stronger link between the concepts.…”
Section: Bibliometric Analysismentioning
confidence: 89%
“…There are examples where the co-development of food and tourism taps into this development, for example the peer2peer platforms, which activates resources in new ways and moves the accumulation opportunities from standard restaurants to the platform owners, but also creates a touristic market access for particular categories of food producers (Atsiz, Cifci, & Law, 2021). Digitalization is critical for business model innovation in almost all subsectors or forms of tourism, although food has been later movers in this respect than many other consumption elements (Baralla, Pinna, Tonelli, Marchesi, & Ibba, 2021;Schimperna, Lombardi, & Belyaeva, 2020).…”
Section: Business Models and Business Model Innovationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The advent of new technologies is deeply affecting companies, forcing them to adapt and innovate their business processes (Krumeich et al , 2014; Schimperna et al , 2020), means of production and ways to generate value (Pavlou and El Sawy, 2010; Karimi and Walter, 2015; Berghaus and Back, 2016; Marrone and Hazelton, 2019). “Digitalisation is opening up fascinating innovation opportunities for innovators, creators and organisations” (Yoo et al , 2010 ; Nambisan, 2017 ; Ramaswamy and Ozcan, 2018) (Lombardi and Secundo, 2021) operating in all economic fields (Hossnofsky and Junge, 2019; Kohnová et al , 2019; Lombardi et al , 2021a).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, digital transformation radically changed the way public and private organisations operate (Lombardi et al, 2020;Nambisan, 2017;Rippa and Secundo, 2018;Schimperna et al, 2020;Lombardi et al, 2021a), fostering them to adopt new technologies (e. g. social media, mobile, business analytics, Internet of Things, Big data, Advanced Manufacturing/Industry 4.0/5.0, digital-to-physical-transfer, cloud and cyber-solutions, artificial intelligence) to gain significant benefits (Fischer and Reuber, 2011;Greenstein et al, 2013;Fitzgerald et al, 2014;Lardo et al, 2017;Nambisan et al, 2017). Among new technologies, social media, such as Twitter, Facebook or YouTube have become increasingly important because of the creation, sharing and exchange of information with countless counterparts (Leonardi and Vaast, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%