2006
DOI: 10.1002/itdj.20050
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Technological frames of stakeholders shaping the SDI implementation: A case study from India

Abstract: The theory of technological frames provides a useful lens to analyze and understand diverse meanings and expectations attached by different stakeholder groups around information and communication technologies (ICTs) sought to be introduced in organizations. These differing perceptions have been found to variously problematize new IS design and implementation efforts. In this article, the key concepts articulated around technological frames are drawn upon to analyze the meanings, assumptions, and expectations e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0
14

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(51 reference statements)
1
19
0
14
Order By: Relevance
“…There is an assumption that the users' involvement ensures identification and capture of their unmet requirements. When users, and other stakeholders, are involved in SDI development, they feel empowered to express their requirements (Craglia and Annoni 2007) and their divergent technological frames get converted into a shared understanding (Puri 2006). The call for this participatory discourse is similar to the shift from system-centered to user-centered approach to information service design in the 1980s (Dervin and Nilan 1986;Wilson 1994Wilson , 2000.…”
Section: Organizational Usersmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There is an assumption that the users' involvement ensures identification and capture of their unmet requirements. When users, and other stakeholders, are involved in SDI development, they feel empowered to express their requirements (Craglia and Annoni 2007) and their divergent technological frames get converted into a shared understanding (Puri 2006). The call for this participatory discourse is similar to the shift from system-centered to user-centered approach to information service design in the 1980s (Dervin and Nilan 1986;Wilson 1994Wilson , 2000.…”
Section: Organizational Usersmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…If geospatial objects have been captured and represented in databases using the supplier's priorities and perceptions, the disparity between the supplier and the user continues even with services generated from these objects. Puri (2006) finds widespread perceptual differences among different SDI stakeholders-including suppliers and users-of the Indian NSDI.…”
Section: Organizational Usersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They also included studies of benefits, barriers, success factors, risk assessment and applicable results; and to a lesser degree, they were concerned with government recommendations, roles and policies, improving implementation, and sustainability. For example, Bhatnagar and Singh (2009) reported results on the impact of e-government projects in India by measuring and comparing ratings for computerized vs. manual systems and Puri (2006) made the case for how design and implementation could be improved for India's National Spatial Data Infrastructure.…”
Section: Dominant Types Of Research Questionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…J. Davis & Hufnagel, 2007;Hsu, 2007;Jensen & Aanestad, 2007;Lin & Cornford, 2000;McLeod & Davidson, 2007;Mengesha, 2008;Puri, 2006;Sahay et al, 1994;Sandford & Bhattacherjee, 2008;Sobreperez, 2008;Wang et al, 2007). Even the original work by Orlikowski and Gash (1994) examined frames over a short 5-month implementation period.…”
Section: Technological Framesmentioning
confidence: 95%