1998
DOI: 10.1111/1467-6419.00051
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Technological Diffusion: Alternative Theories and Historical Evidence

Abstract: This paper presents an interpretive survey of the neoclassical and evolutionary approaches to modeling the process of technological diffusion, with an orientation that is distinct in two important respects from existing surveys. First, the present survey is designed to provide a comparative overview of the alternative approaches within a unified framework of analysis. The objective is to bring out the areas of convergence as well as divergence between the approaches, and address the issue of whether the approa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
57
0
2

Year Published

2005
2005
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
1
57
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The initial studies (and a good share of the publications) about diffusion of innovations have taken place in the field of agriculture [3]. More recent references [4][5][6][7] provide literature reviews concerning theories of diffusion models. Historically, there have been two major approaches to the diffusion of innovations; those trying to reproduce the patterns of diffusion [8] and those trying to understand the underlying factors that affect decision-making mechanisms determining the market roll-out of innovations.…”
Section: How This New Approach To the Diffusion Of Technology Innovatmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The initial studies (and a good share of the publications) about diffusion of innovations have taken place in the field of agriculture [3]. More recent references [4][5][6][7] provide literature reviews concerning theories of diffusion models. Historically, there have been two major approaches to the diffusion of innovations; those trying to reproduce the patterns of diffusion [8] and those trying to understand the underlying factors that affect decision-making mechanisms determining the market roll-out of innovations.…”
Section: How This New Approach To the Diffusion Of Technology Innovatmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, as the proposed approach relies on some explanatory reasons to describe how the technologies evolve, we check in Section 3.1 the goodness of an ARMAX model that uses the prices of scrap, electricity, and steel to model EAF production in Japan. The purpose of using the ARMAX model is to define a linear combination of parameters that work, and can be used in function f (t) in (4), that is, that can be used as the driving force of the innovations in the new approach. Once we check the ability of those variables to depict the evolution of EAF, we apply in Section 3.2 the approach to the diffusion processes discussed in Section 2 to the diffusion of EAF technology in Japan.…”
Section: Application To the Case Of The Diffusion Of An Energy Efficimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been a very popular research topic, especially after World War II, when Schumpeterian economics took off and the idea of economic growth became a strong driver for governments (Sarkar, 1998). Schumpeter (2003Schumpeter ( [1943) claimed that institutions, technological progress and innovators were the promoters of economic growth.…”
Section: Technology Adaptation: the Social Acceptance Of Technology Imentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is not just any claim, as it has to a large extent justified the reliance on innovations, mainly technological, for the improvement of nations during the last seventy years. Although the processes of invention and innovation are central to the development of new technology, the process of diffusion is what actually determines the extent to which this technology will be put into productive use (Sarkar, 1998).…”
Section: Technology Adaptation: the Social Acceptance Of Technology Imentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Technology adoption and diffusion models (e.g. Thirtle and Ruttan, 1987;Sarkar, 1998), both at the micro-economic and the aggregate level, can provide valuable insights for a better understanding of actual and required transitions in the energy-converting capital stock composition, related fuel consumption patterns, underlying investment decisions, and technological trajectories followed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%