2020
DOI: 10.3390/w12030672
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Techno-Economic Evaluation of Iron and Aluminum Coagulants on Se(IV) Removal

Abstract: Research on selenium pollution in natural waters is continuous and discouraging. In this study, coagulation/precipitation was applied with the use of Fe(II), Fe(III), and poly-aluminum chloride (PACl) salts for Se(IV) removal at concentration range 10–100 μg Se(IV)/L that is commonly found in drinking waters. Prehydrolyzed Fe(III)-FeCl3 delivered the best uptake capacity (Q10 = 8.9 mg Se(IV)/g Fe(III) at pH 6) at the residual concentration equal to the drinking water regulation limit of 10 μg/L. This was much … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Aluminum coagulants, such as AlCl 3 or poly-aluminum chloride PAC, are very commonly used for water treatment too, since Al cations hydrolyze quickly and form abundant hydroxide precipitates in situ, which can act in a similar way to their homologous ferric compounds. Nevertheless, the research about the use of aluminum coagulants for selenium removal has demonstrated that the use of ferric compounds was preferred, since they were much more efficient [223,224]. Nevertheless, the performance of the coagulation process can be enhanced with the addition of commercially available polymeric flocculants, which enhanced the removal of selenium [225].…”
Section: Coagulation-flocculation-precipitation Followed By Filtrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aluminum coagulants, such as AlCl 3 or poly-aluminum chloride PAC, are very commonly used for water treatment too, since Al cations hydrolyze quickly and form abundant hydroxide precipitates in situ, which can act in a similar way to their homologous ferric compounds. Nevertheless, the research about the use of aluminum coagulants for selenium removal has demonstrated that the use of ferric compounds was preferred, since they were much more efficient [223,224]. Nevertheless, the performance of the coagulation process can be enhanced with the addition of commercially available polymeric flocculants, which enhanced the removal of selenium [225].…”
Section: Coagulation-flocculation-precipitation Followed By Filtrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The experimental results (Figure 1) for Se(IV) coagulation/precipitation by Fe(III) at pH 7 delivered a Q10 value of 3.2 μg Se(IV)/mg Fe(III) with the data best fitted in a BET adsorption model (Table 4) that indicated the Se(IV) removal by a physisorption process [28]. In order to estimate the cost of treatment, the Fe(III) dose required for the removal of Se(IV) from natural water at an initial concentration of 100 μg Se(IV)/L and pH 7 can be calculated as follows:…”
Section: Coagulation Testsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Reaksi adsorbsi pada proses koagulasi termasuk reaksi endotermis atau reaksi eksotermis tergantung jenis adsorben dan adsorbat. Proses koagulasi menggunakan koagulan garam Fe(II), Fe(III) dan poly-aluminium chloride untuk mengadsorb Se(IV) adalah eksotermis (Kalaitzidou et al, 2020). Proses koagulasi menggunakan koagulan alam Leucaena crude extract untuk mengadsorb Congo red adalah endotermis (Kristianto et al, 2022).…”
Section: Analisa Eksperimenunclassified