Techno-economic evaluation of cryogenic CO2 capture—A comparison with absorption and membrane technology

Tuinier, Martin; Hamers, H.P.; Annaland, Martin van Sint

doi:10.1016/j.ijggc.2011.08.013

Cited by 125 publications

(62 citation statements)

References 10 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Th e fi rst case considers the exhaust fl ue gases of the cement for air combustion, while the second case considers recycling of ballast and Figure 11. Cement production process 2 capture by antisublimation no oxygen production is needed, while for oxycombustion, systems for fl ue-gas scrubbing, water removal, and CO 2 compression are necessary (Table 5).…”

Section: Technical Economic Analysis Compared To Oxycombustion For a mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…However, Burt et al 1 found at least 30% economic and energy savings compared to most competing processes such as solvent and oxygen-based systems, membranes and IGCC (Integrated Gasifi cation Combined Cycles). Tuinier et al 2 made an economic analysis comparing cryogenic CO 2 capture to amine absorption and membrane separation for a 600 MW coal-fi red power plant. Th ey found out that the preferred technology depends heavily on the availability of utilities.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

CO₂ capture by antisublimation process and its technical economic analysis

Pan¹,

Clodic²,

Toubassy³

2013

Greenhouse Gases

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

CO 2 capture by antisublimation consists in cooling the fl ue gases down to the freezing temperature of CO 2 and frosting CO 2 on a low temperature heat exchanger surface at a temperature range defi ned by the CO 2 concentration in the fl ue gases and the CO 2 capture effi ciency. CO 2 is then defrosted and recovered in a liquid state. This CO 2 capture process by antisublimation is called AnSU®. The CO 2 frosting temperature in fl ue gases is much lower than the triple point of water and therefore before CO 2 capture, water contained in fl ue gases is removed to reach high purity CO 2 .This paper presents an overview of the antisublimation process and a brief review of test benches that have been set up in laboratory and on industry sites for validation and optimization of the antisublimation process dating back to the fi rst one constructed in 2003. Energy consumption and cost penalty of CO 2 capture by antisublimation are evaluated for a coal-fi red power plant. A technical and economic analysis has been made and compared to CO 2 capture by oxycombustion for a cement plant. Those two processes can be seen as cryogenics options and the detailed comparison gives insight into where energy losses take place and which capture process could be most adapted depending on specifi cations of the cement industry.

show abstract

Section: Technical Economic Analysis Compared To Oxycombustion For a mentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

CO₂ capture by antisublimation process and its technical economic analysis

Pan¹,

Clodic²,

Toubassy³

2013

Greenhouse Gases

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Removal of CO 2 may be performed by, for instance, membrane separation [7], cryogenic method [8], or solid or liquid sorbents [9][10][11][12]. Those methods may be implemented for capturing carbon dioxide from precombustion, postcombustion, oxyfuel combustion, and chemical looping combustion [13].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Impact on CO₂ Uptake of MWCNT after Acid Treatment Study

Zgrzebnicki

Krauze

Gęsikiewicz-Puchalska

et al. 2017

Journal of Nanomaterials

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Greenhouse effect is responsible for keeping average temperature of Earth's atmosphere at level of about 288 K. Its intensification leads to warming of our planet and may contribute to adverse changes in the environment. The most important pollution intensifying greenhouse effect is anthropogenic carbon dioxide. This particular gas absorbs secondary infrared radiation, which in the end leads to an increase of average temperature of Earth's atmosphere. Main source of CO 2 is burning of fossil fuels, like oil, natural gas, and coal. Therefore, to reduce its emission, a special CO 2 capture and storage technology is required. Carbonaceous materials are promising materials for CO 2 sorbents. Thus multiwalled carbon nanotubes, due to the lack of impurities like ash in activated carbons, were chosen as a model material for investigation of acid treatment impact on CO 2 uptake. Remarkable 43% enhancement of CO 2 sorption capacity was achieved at 273 K and relative pressure of 0.95. Samples were also thoroughly characterized in terms of texture (specific surface area measurement, transmission electron microscope) and chemical composition (X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy).

show abstract

“…other factors like corrosivity (Daneshvar et al, 2004;Zhao et al, 2011), price, utility costs (Nuchitprasittichai and Cremaschi, 2013;Peters et al, 2011;Tuinier et al, 2011), absorbent selectivity and degradation with time/nature (Wang et al, 2015), hazardousness, CO 2 tax/penalty/price, safety issues. MEA is a frequently studied and applied because its properties are quite well known which makes it the most suitable for wide scale modeling studies (Wagner et al, 2013;Conway et al, 2015;Peters et al, 2011;Bidart et al, 2011) and gives an excellent base for comparison with possible other absorbent candidates.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Model verification and analysis of the CO2-MEA absorber–desorber system

Nagy

Mizsey

2015

International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Techno-economic evaluation of cryogenic CO2 capture—A comparison with absorption and membrane technology

Cited by 125 publications

References 10 publications

CO₂ capture by antisublimation process and its technical economic analysis

CO₂ capture by antisublimation process and its technical economic analysis

Impact on CO₂ Uptake of MWCNT after Acid Treatment Study

Model verification and analysis of the CO2-MEA absorber–desorber system

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About

Techno-economic evaluation of cryogenic CO2 capture—A comparison with absorption and membrane technology

Cited by 125 publications

References 10 publications

CO2 capture by antisublimation process and its technical economic analysis

CO2 capture by antisublimation process and its technical economic analysis

Impact on CO2 Uptake of MWCNT after Acid Treatment Study

Model verification and analysis of the CO2-MEA absorber–desorber system

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About

CO₂ capture by antisublimation process and its technical economic analysis

CO₂ capture by antisublimation process and its technical economic analysis

Impact on CO₂ Uptake of MWCNT after Acid Treatment Study