Abstract:In this study, a techno-economic assessment of an on-farm biogas system using an anaerobic biofilm reactor utilizing cow manure as a fermentation substrate was evaluated. A projection model was developed using Microsoft Excel software with three outputs, the size and dimension of a bioreactor, experimental microbial kinetic studies, and the economic studies based on the experimental results. Characterization analysis of cow manure wastewater showed the total solid (TS), total volatile solid (TVS), total carboh… Show more
“…The sum of fixed capital investment (FCI), cost of operational labor (COL), cost of utilities (CUT), cost of waste treatment (CWT), and cost of raw material (CRM) represents the total annual cost for carrying out the AD of jabuticaba by-product. In general, the results showed that the management of jabuticaba by-product with the simulated small-scale AD process can be considered a low-cost process for properly disposing waste from industrial processing [37]. The total cost was higher for Scenario 2 (9034.76 USD y −1 ), especially because this scenario presented high FCI (4990.80 USD y −1 ).…”
Bioenergy recovery from biomass by-products is a promising approach for the circular bioeconomy transition. However, the management of agri-food by-products in stand-alone treatment facilities is a challenge for the low-capacity food processing industry. In this study, the techno-economic assessment of a small-scale anaerobic digestion process was evaluated for the management of jabuticaba by-product and the production of biomethane, electricity, heat, and fertilizer. The process was simulated for a treatment capacity of 782.2 m3 y−1 jabuticaba peel, considering the experimental methane production of 42.31 L CH4 kg−1 TVS. The results of the scaled-up simulated process demonstrated the production of biomethane (13,960.17 m3 y−1), electricity (61.76 MWh y−1), heat (197.62 GJ y−1), and fertilizer (211.47 t y−1). Economic analysis revealed that the process for biomethane recovery from biogas is not profitable, with a net margin of −19.58% and an internal rate of return of −1.77%. However, biogas application in a heat and power unit can improve project feasibility, with a net margin of 33.03%, an internal rate of return of 13.14%, and a payback of 5.03 years. In conclusion, the application of small-scale anaerobic digestion can prevent the wrongful open-air disposal of jabuticaba by-products, with the generation of renewable energy and biofertilizer supporting the green economy toward the transition to a circular economy.
“…The sum of fixed capital investment (FCI), cost of operational labor (COL), cost of utilities (CUT), cost of waste treatment (CWT), and cost of raw material (CRM) represents the total annual cost for carrying out the AD of jabuticaba by-product. In general, the results showed that the management of jabuticaba by-product with the simulated small-scale AD process can be considered a low-cost process for properly disposing waste from industrial processing [37]. The total cost was higher for Scenario 2 (9034.76 USD y −1 ), especially because this scenario presented high FCI (4990.80 USD y −1 ).…”
Bioenergy recovery from biomass by-products is a promising approach for the circular bioeconomy transition. However, the management of agri-food by-products in stand-alone treatment facilities is a challenge for the low-capacity food processing industry. In this study, the techno-economic assessment of a small-scale anaerobic digestion process was evaluated for the management of jabuticaba by-product and the production of biomethane, electricity, heat, and fertilizer. The process was simulated for a treatment capacity of 782.2 m3 y−1 jabuticaba peel, considering the experimental methane production of 42.31 L CH4 kg−1 TVS. The results of the scaled-up simulated process demonstrated the production of biomethane (13,960.17 m3 y−1), electricity (61.76 MWh y−1), heat (197.62 GJ y−1), and fertilizer (211.47 t y−1). Economic analysis revealed that the process for biomethane recovery from biogas is not profitable, with a net margin of −19.58% and an internal rate of return of −1.77%. However, biogas application in a heat and power unit can improve project feasibility, with a net margin of 33.03%, an internal rate of return of 13.14%, and a payback of 5.03 years. In conclusion, the application of small-scale anaerobic digestion can prevent the wrongful open-air disposal of jabuticaba by-products, with the generation of renewable energy and biofertilizer supporting the green economy toward the transition to a circular economy.
“…A general analysis of most studies conducted on AD of farm waste [11][12][13][14][15] indicates that older studies focused on understanding the process fundamentals while recent studies focused on improving efficacy. Moreover, the few reviews published on the subject mainly report on the different aspects of AD (Tab.…”
The current non‐circular and non‐regenerative approaches to farm dairy waste management have spurred a search for alternatives. Anaerobic digestion of the waste to collect biogas and digestate products is an option with significant potential for reducing the farm's environmental footprint and generating additional revenue. Although much research exists on the anaerobic digestion of dairy manure, there is a lack of detailed understanding of the challenges faced with farm dairy effluent (FDE). In addition, most existing studies lack key data, such as the on‐farm process cost. Therefore, the main aim of this review is to highlight these challenges and offer new insights into possible state‐of‐the‐art solutions The conventional methods of FDE disposal are critically compared to anaerobic digestion for economic, environmental, and technical feasibility. The paper also extends into a case study where a preliminary techno‐economic assessment showed that in New Zealand, $2.3 million would be required to set up a farm anaerobic digestion plant with a 900‐cow capacity. This information can aid decision‐making on policies for farm technologies.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.