2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijggc.2012.02.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Techno-economic assessment of CO2 capture at steam methane reforming facilities using commercially available technology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
45
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
(16 reference statements)
1
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As in the previous case, H 2 is produced via naphtha steam reforming followed by a WGS reaction. The most efficient CO 2 capture point in steam reforming facilities is upstream the PSA unit [10]. Chemical absorption with ADIP-X solvent (a mixture of methyl diethanolamine (MDEA) and piperazine) leads to a capture efficiency of 95% of the total CO 2 emissions, which corresponds to 552 kt/a of CO 2 .…”
Section: H 2 Productionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…As in the previous case, H 2 is produced via naphtha steam reforming followed by a WGS reaction. The most efficient CO 2 capture point in steam reforming facilities is upstream the PSA unit [10]. Chemical absorption with ADIP-X solvent (a mixture of methyl diethanolamine (MDEA) and piperazine) leads to a capture efficiency of 95% of the total CO 2 emissions, which corresponds to 552 kt/a of CO 2 .…”
Section: H 2 Productionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The model of the capture unit was based on a previous in-house study at Utrecht University [10]. The H 2 concentration entering the PSA must be equal to or greater than 70 mol% for an economical PSA process that achieves 85% per-pass H 2 separation [24].…”
Section: Technical -Process Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The penalty of CO 2 capture in terms of e ciency and costs has been evaluated by the European Technology Platform [1], the International Panel on Climate Change [22] and the International Energy Agency [2]. Diverse layouts have been compared by [23] and [24]. Di↵erent process configurations based on fossil and renewable resources have been evaluated based on process modelling and simulation in [25][26][27] and [28] without including detailed process integration and economic…”
Section: Co 2 Capture In Power Plantsmentioning
confidence: 99%