2006 IEEE Aerospace Conference
DOI: 10.1109/aero.2006.1655958
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Techniques to Enable FPGA Based Reconfigurable Fault Tolerant Space Computing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, the speed of the system decreases due to the addition of a new stage. Some representative applications can be found at the literature [54]- [56].…”
Section: ) Triple Modular Redundancymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, the speed of the system decreases due to the addition of a new stage. Some representative applications can be found at the literature [54]- [56].…”
Section: ) Triple Modular Redundancymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In literature, when considering multi-FPGA platforms, the available devices are usually exploited to host replicas of the main system as in Smith and de la Torre [2006], where three FPGAs are used to apply the classical Triple Modular Redundancy (TMR) technique on the whole circuit. Each FPGA hosts the same configuration and an external radiation-hardened ASIC implements a controller that acts as a TMR voter.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The other designs exclude certain components, and these are compared with design 1 so percentage hardware overhead can be calculated. To put these figures in context, triple modular redundancy (TMR, the most prevalent testing method currently used, where each system is triplicated and the results combined using majority voting hardware [22]) requires 200% overhead plus a non-trivial amount of extra for the voting circuitry; if voting is done at a functional (as opposed to system) level, overheads as high as 700% are reported [25]. Further, in Unitronics, only one external controller (UXC) is needed for several arrays of cells, so its overhead of 28.9% (found by comparing design 3 and 4) relative to one cell can be considered negligible when compared to several arrays of several hundred cells each.…”
Section: Hardware Overhead Of Test and Repair Mechanismsmentioning
confidence: 99%