2015 IEEE 21st International Conference on Embedded and Real-Time Computing Systems and Applications 2015
DOI: 10.1109/rtcsa.2015.36
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Techniques for Schedulability Analysis in Mode Change Systems under Fixed-Priority Scheduling

Abstract: With the advent of cyber-physical systems, realtime tasks shall be run in different modes over time to react to the change of the physical environment. It is preferable to adopt high expressive models in real-time systems. In the light of simple implementation in kernels, fixed-priority scheduling has been widely adopted in commercial real-time systems. In this work we derive a technique for analyzing schedulability of the system where tasks can undergo mode change under fixed-priority scheduling. We study two… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, most of the existing fixed-priority scheduling results for the GMF task model assume a unique priority level per task. To the best of our knowledge, the only results that can be applied for a unique level per computation segment are the utilization-based analysis in [CHL16,HC15c].…”
Section: Incorrect Analysis Of Segmented Fixed-priority Scheduling Wimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, most of the existing fixed-priority scheduling results for the GMF task model assume a unique priority level per task. To the best of our knowledge, the only results that can be applied for a unique level per computation segment are the utilization-based analysis in [CHL16,HC15c].…”
Section: Incorrect Analysis Of Segmented Fixed-priority Scheduling Wimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the rst case, i.e., ∆ > T min i , let t * < ∆ be the arrival time of the last job in the above pattern. Lemma 2 in [16] proves that the maximum interference from 0 to t * (without the last job) is at most U max i ×t * . Therefore, by including the (last) job released at or after t * , the maximum interference incurred by τ i is at most U max i ×∆+C max i .…”
Section: Angle-synchronous Tasksmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In the literature, such tasks are also called variable-rate-behaviour tasks [11] or multi-mode tasks [16]. Schedulability tests of such angle-synchronous tasks under FP scheduling have been proposed in [11,16].…”
Section: Angle-synchronous Tasksmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations