2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jterra.2010.04.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Techniques for averting and correcting errors in 3D terrain topology measurements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Discussion about the emerging 3D terrain measurement capabilities can be found elsewhere (Chemistruck, Binns, & Ferris, 2011;Smith & Ferris, 2010a, 2010bDetweiler & Ferris, 2010), and is beyond the scope of this chapter. However, it is the objective of this section to present the vehicle suspension load analysis based on measured 3D terrain profiles.…”
Section: Vehicle Load Analysis Using 3d Digitized Road Profilesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Discussion about the emerging 3D terrain measurement capabilities can be found elsewhere (Chemistruck, Binns, & Ferris, 2011;Smith & Ferris, 2010a, 2010bDetweiler & Ferris, 2010), and is beyond the scope of this chapter. However, it is the objective of this section to present the vehicle suspension load analysis based on measured 3D terrain profiles.…”
Section: Vehicle Load Analysis Using 3d Digitized Road Profilesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each method produces a different data representation; therefore, one of the key issues to be resolved is the selection of the gridding method. It is essential to make a good selection, otherwise the results obtained and therefore the diagnosis of the pathology will not be correct (Smith & Ferris 2010). In general, the procedure for levelling interior spaces in a building that is mostly regular produces a homogeneous data set.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%