Technical Progress, Inefficiency, and Productivity Change in U.S. Banking, 1984-1993

Abstract

Numerous studies have found that US commercial banks are quite inefficient, and we find that, on average, banks became more technically inefficient between 1984 and 1993. Our analysis of productivity change, however, shows that technological improvements adopted by a few banks pushed out the efficient frontier, and that, on average, commercial banks experienced productivity gains. For banks with assets less than $300 million, however, technological improvement was insufficient to offset increased inefficiency, and thus productivity declined over the period. Our findings suggest that increasing inefficiency is reflective of an industry undergoing rapid technical change and adjustment of average firm size, but not necessarily a long-term decline.

The Determinants of Cost/Profit Efficiency of Islamic Banks Before, During and After the Subprime Crisis Using SFA Approach

“…Some authors propose to measure the labor factor by the number of employees (Sassenou, 1999) or the number of employees in full-time equivalent (Wheelock and Wilson, 1999). The ratio of personal expenses to total asset seems unanimously the measure adopted to assess this input.…”

Social efficiency in microfinance institutions

“…Berger and Humphrey (1997), Berg et al (1993), Sherman and Gold (1985), Worthington (1998), Athanassoupoulos (1997), English et al (1993), Miller and Noulas (1996), and Wheelock and Wilson (1999). Mixmarket defines it as: "the outstanding principal balance of all of the MFI's outstanding loans including current, delinquent and restructured loans, but not loans that have been written off.…”

Macroprudential regulation and bank performance: Does ownership matter?

“…However, given the inherent difficulties inherent in cross-country comparisons, studies have also been conducted at the country-level. At the country level, studies have examined, among others, the performance of banks in the US (Elyasiani and Mehdian, 1995;Wheelock and Wilson, 1999), Norway (Berg et al, 1992), Thailand (Leightner, 1997), Korea (Gilbert and Wilson, 1998) and Taiwan (Shyu, 1998).…”

“…The evidence emanating from empirical research is admittedly mixed. One set of studies find that financial deregulation leads to an increase in the resilience and performance of the banking sector (Boyd and De Nicolo, 2005;Das and Ghosh, 2006;Yeyati and Micco, 2007), while others find that the net effect of financial deregulation on the banking sector to be negative (Keeley, 1990;Grifell-Tatje and Lovell, 1996;Wheelock and Wilson, 1999).…”