Technical Note: Influence of Compton currents on profile measurements in small‐volume ion chambers

Tanny, S; Holmes, S; Sperling, N; Parsai, E

doi:10.1118/1.4929555

Cited by 4 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 12 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The motivations of this work are multifolded. The polarity effect for an ionization chamber is expected to become more dominant with decreasing sensitive air volume . Due to the increasing use of these compact ionization chambers for small field output factor measurements, the need to quantify the dependence of the polarity effect on field sizes of these compact chambers is addressed in this work.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The polarity effect of compact ionization chambers used for small field dosimetry

et al. 2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose The recent developments of compact air‐filled ionization chambers for use in small photon beams have raised the needs to address the associated polarity effect. The polarity effect of five compact ionization chambers has been quantified at small field sizes. The origins of the polarity effect are studied experimentally and through Monte‐Carlo simulations. For this purpose, the one‐dimensional lateral dose–response functions were determined using positive and negative chamber's polarity. Monte‐Carlo simulations were performed to study the underlying mechanism of the polarity effect by quantifying the charge imbalance in the collecting electrode and cable. Methods Five novel compact ionization chamber designs have been studied (PTW‐Freiburg: Semiflex 3D 31021, PinPoint 3D 31022 and PinPoint 31023; IBA Dosimetry: Razor chamber CC01‐G and Razor Nano‐chamber CC003). Output ratios were measured down to a nominal field side length of 3 mm using both polarities to evaluate the polarity effect at different field sizes. The small field output correction factors were derived using a scintillator detector as reference. To identify the origins of the polarity effect, slit beam measurements were performed to obtain their lateral dose–response functions. All measurements were performed using three chamber orientations: axial, radial crossplane, and radial inplane. The chambers were modeled according to the manufacturers' blueprints using the Monte‐Carlo package EGSnrc. The charge imbalance due to electrons entering and leaving the inner electrode and cable was studied using an adapted user‐code. Results The output ratios obtained using all five chambers show field size‐dependent polarity effects at small field sizes in the axial orientation, whereas no significant field size dependence of the polarity effect has been observed in the radial orientations. The chambers' lateral dose–response functions reveal that the radiation‐induced charge imbalance in the inner electrode and cable is the main cause of the observed polarity effect at small field sizes. The effect is weakest for the largest PTW 31021 chamber but intensifies for smaller chambers with decreasing sensitive air volume. Consistent results have been obtained between Monte‐Carlo simulations and measurement data. Conclusions Awareness needs to be raised so that the polarity effect of novel compact ionization chambers is appropriately accounted for in small field dosimetry. The results in this work are useful to identify the magnitude of the polarity effect correction and to assist in the decisions on choosing the appropriate chambers and setups during measurements. The origins of the observed polarity effect have been elucidated using the chambers' lateral dose–response functions. The adapted Monte‐Carlo user‐code has been used to compute the radiation‐induced charge imbalance in the chamber's components. It opens the possibility to study the chamber's design with the aim to minimize its polarity effect. Small field output correction factors computed according to...

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The polarity effect of compact ionization chambers used for small field dosimetry

et al. 2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…They found a depth‐dependent effect that is small except close to the surface for the studied Exradin A16 chamber (7 mm³) and suggested electron contamination to be the cause. For electron beams, polarity effects seem to depend on a variety of parameters such as the cable, stem length, energy and field size . This suggests that the interplay between polarity, detector construction details and electron contamination near the surface needs to be further analyzed.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Electrometer offset current due to scattered radiation

Wegener

Sauer

2018

J Applied Clin Med Phys

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Relative dose measurements with small ionization chambers in combination with an electrometer placed in the treatment room (“internal electrometer”) show a large dependence on the polarity used. While this was observed previously for percent depth dose curves (PDDs), the effect has not been understood or preventable. To investigate the polarity dependence of internal electrometers used in conjunction with a small‐volume ionization chamber, we placed an internal electrometer at a distance of 1 m from the isocenter and exposed it to different amounts of scattered radiation by varying the field size. We identified irradiation of the electrometer to cause a current of approximately −1 pA, regardless of the sign of the biasing voltage. For low‐sensitivity detectors, such a current noticeably distorts relative dose measurements. To demonstrate how the current systematically changes PDDs, we collected measurements with nine ionization chambers of different volumes. As the chamber volume decreased, signal ratios at 20 and 10 cm depth (M20/M10) became smaller for positive bias voltage and larger for negative bias voltage. At the size of the iba CC04 (40 mm³) the difference of M20/M10 was around 1% and for the smallest studied chamber, the iba CC003 chamber (3 mm³), around 7% for a 10 × 10 cm² field. When the electrometer was moved further from the source or shielded, the additional current decreased. Consequently, PDDs at both polarities were brought into alignment at depth even for the 3 mm³ ionization chamber. The apparent polarity effect on PDDs and lateral beam profiles was reduced considerably by shielding the electrometer. Due to normalization the effect on output values was low. When measurements with a low‐sensitivity probe are carried out in conjunction with an internal electrometer, we recommend careful monitoring of the particular setup by testing both polarities, and if deemed necessary, we suggest shielding the electrometer.

show abstract

“…The need to carefully consider the cable effect has been pointed out not only for dosimetry involving large radiation fields including total body irradiation and total skin electron therapy but also for output measurement and profile measurements. 11,[16][17][18][19][20] In this report, the cable effect of an ionization chamber from a megavoltage photon beam was evaluated by measurement, and the mechanism of Compton current was investigated by Monte Carlo simulation.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Estimation of the cable effect in megavoltage photon beam by measurement and Monte Carlo simulation

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose Ionization chambers are widely used for dosimetry with megavoltage photon beams. Several properties of ionization chambers, including the cable effect, polarity effect, and ion recombination loss, are described in standard dosimetry protocols. The cable effect is categorized as the leakage current and Compton current, and careful consideration of these factors has been described not only in reference dosimetry but also in large fields. However, the mechanism of Compton current in the cable has not been investigated thoroughly. The cable effect of ionization chambers in 6 MV X‐ray beam was evaluated by measurement, and the mechanism of Compton current was investigated by Monte Carlo simulation. Materials and Methods Four PTW ionization chambers (TM30013, TM31010, TM31014, and TM31016) with the same type of mounted cable, but different ionization volumes, were used to measure output factor (OPF) and cable effect measurement. The OPF was measured to observe any variation resulting from the cable effect. The cable effect was evaluated separately for the leakage current and Compton current, and its charge per absorbed dose to water per cable length was estimated by a newly proposed method. The behavior of electrons and positrons in the core wire was analyzed and the Compton current for the photon beam was estimated by Monte Carlo simulation. Results In OPF measurement, the difference in the electrometer readings by polarity became obvious for the mini‐ or microchamber and its difference tended to be larger for a chamber with a smaller ionization volume. For the cable effect measurement, it was determined that the contribution of the leakage current to the cable effect was ignorable, while the Compton current was dominant. The charge due to the Compton current per absorbed dose to water per cable length was estimated to be 0.36 ± 0.03 pC Gy−1 cm−1 for PTW ionization chambers. As a result, the contribution of the Compton current to the electrometer readings was estimated to be 0.002% cm−1 for the Farmer‐type, 0.011% cm−1 for the scanning, and 0.088% cm−1 for microchambers, respectively. By the simulation, it was determined that the Compton current for MV x‐ray could be explained by not only recoil electrons due to Compton scattering but also positron due to pair production. The Compton current estimated by the difference in outflowing and inflowing charge was 0.45 pC Gy−1 cm−1 and was comparable with the measured value. Conclusion The cable effect, which includes the leakage current and Compton current, was quantitatively estimated for several chambers from measurements, and the mechanism of Compton current was investigated by Monte Carlo simulation. It was determined that the Compton current is a dominant component of the cable effect and its charge is consistently positive and nearly the same, irrespective of the ionization chamber volume. The contribution of Compton current to the electrometer readings was estimated for chambers. The mechanism of Compton current was analyzed and it was confirmed that the Comp...

show abstract

Technical Note: Influence of Compton currents on profile measurements in small‐volume ion chambers

Abstract: Microchambers can demonstrate significant (>5%) deviations from properties as measured with larger volume chambers (0.125 cm(3) and above). These deviations can be substantially reduced by averaging measurements conducted at opposite polarities.

Cited by 4 publications

References 12 publications

The polarity effect of compact ionization chambers used for small field dosimetry

The polarity effect of compact ionization chambers used for small field dosimetry

Electrometer offset current due to scattered radiation

Estimation of the cable effect in megavoltage photon beam by measurement and Monte Carlo simulation

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About