Deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH) is a common method used worldwide for reducing the radiation dose to the heart. However, few studies have reported on the relationship between dose reduction and patient-specific parameters. The aim of this study was to compare the reductions of heart dose and volume using DIBH with the dose/volume of free breathing (FB) for patients with left-sided breast cancer and to analyse patient-specific dose reduction parameters. A total of 85 Asian patients who underwent whole-breast radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery were recruited. Treatment plans for FB and DIBH were retrospectively generated by using an automated breast planning tool with a two-field tangential intensity-modulated radiation therapy technique. The prescribed dose was 50 Gy in 25 fractions. The dosimetric parameters (e.g., mean dose and maximum dose) in heart and lung were extracted from the dose–volume histogram. The relationships between dose–volume data and patient-specific parameters, such as age, body mass index (BMI), and inspiratory volume, were analyzed. The mean heart doses for the FB and DIBH plans were 1.56 Gy and 0.75 Gy, respectively, a relative reduction of 47%. There were significant differences in all heart dosimetric parameters (p < 0.001). For patients with a high heart dose in the FB plan, a relative reduction of the mean heart dose correlated with inspiratory volume (r = 0.646). There was correlation between the relative reduction of mean heart dose and BMI (r = −0.248). We recommend considering the possible feasibility of DIBH in low BMI patients because the degree of benefit from DIBH varied with BMI.
Accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) is alternative treatment option for patients with early stage breast cancer. The interplay effect on volumetric modulated arc therapy APBI (VMAT-APBI) has not been clarified. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of VMAT-APBI for patients with small breasts and investigate the amplitude of respiratory motion during VMAT-APBI delivery that significantly affects dose distribution. Methods: The VMAT-APBI plans were generated with 28.5 Gy in five fractions. We performed patient-specific quality assurance using Delta 4 phantom under static conditions. We also measured point dose and dose distribution using the ionization chamber and radiochromic film under static and moving conditions of 2, 3 and 5 mm. We compared the measured and calculated point doses and dose distributions by dose difference and gamma passing rates. Results: A total of 20 plans were generated; the dose distributions were consistent with those of previous reports. For all measurements under static conditions, the measured and calculated point doses and dose distributions showed good agreement. The dose differences for chamber measurement were within 3%, regardless of moving conditions. The mean gamma passing rates with 3%/2 mm criteria in the film measurement under static conditions and with 2 mm, 3 mm, and 5 mm of amplitude were 95.0 ± 2.0%, 93.3 ± 3.3%, 92.1 ± 6.2% and 84.8 ± 7.8%, respectively. The difference between 5 mm amplitude and other conditions was statistically significant. Conclusions: Respiratory management should be considered for the risk of unintended dose distribution if the respiratory amplitude is >5 mm.
A realistic X‐ray energy spectrum is essential for accurate dose calculation using the Monte Carlo (MC) algorithm. An energy spectrum for dose calculation in the radiation treatment planning system is modeled using the MC algorithm and adjusted to obtain acceptable agreement with the measured percent depth dose (PDD) and off‐axis ratio. The simulated energy spectrum may not consistently reproduce a realistic energy spectrum. Therefore, direct measurement of the X‐ray energy spectrum from a linac is necessary to obtain a realistic spectrum. Previous studies have measured low photon fluence directly, but the measurement was performed with a nonclinical linac with a thick target and a long target‐to‐detector distance. In this study, an X‐ray energy spectrum from a clinical linac was directly measured using a NaI(Tl) scintillator at an ultralow dose rate achieved by adjusting the gun grid voltage. The measured energy spectrum was unfolded by the Gold algorithm and compared with a simulated spectrum using statistical tests. Furthermore, the PDD was calculated using an unfolded energy spectrum and a simulated energy spectrum was compared with the measured PDD to evaluate the validity of the unfolded energy spectrum. Consequently, there was no significant difference between the unfolded and simulated energy spectra by nonparametric, Wilcoxon's rank‐sum, chi‐square, and two‐sample Kolmogorov–Smirnov tests with a significance level of 0.05. However, the PDD calculated from the unfolded energy spectrum better agreed with the measured compared to the calculated PDD results from the simulated energy spectrum. The adjustment of the incident electron parameters using MC simulation is sensitive and takes time. Therefore, it is desirable to obtain the energy spectrum by direct measurement. Thus, a method to obtain the realistic energy spectrum by direct measurement was proposed in this study.
Purpose Ionization chambers are widely used for dosimetry with megavoltage photon beams. Several properties of ionization chambers, including the cable effect, polarity effect, and ion recombination loss, are described in standard dosimetry protocols. The cable effect is categorized as the leakage current and Compton current, and careful consideration of these factors has been described not only in reference dosimetry but also in large fields. However, the mechanism of Compton current in the cable has not been investigated thoroughly. The cable effect of ionization chambers in 6 MV X‐ray beam was evaluated by measurement, and the mechanism of Compton current was investigated by Monte Carlo simulation. Materials and Methods Four PTW ionization chambers (TM30013, TM31010, TM31014, and TM31016) with the same type of mounted cable, but different ionization volumes, were used to measure output factor (OPF) and cable effect measurement. The OPF was measured to observe any variation resulting from the cable effect. The cable effect was evaluated separately for the leakage current and Compton current, and its charge per absorbed dose to water per cable length was estimated by a newly proposed method. The behavior of electrons and positrons in the core wire was analyzed and the Compton current for the photon beam was estimated by Monte Carlo simulation. Results In OPF measurement, the difference in the electrometer readings by polarity became obvious for the mini‐ or microchamber and its difference tended to be larger for a chamber with a smaller ionization volume. For the cable effect measurement, it was determined that the contribution of the leakage current to the cable effect was ignorable, while the Compton current was dominant. The charge due to the Compton current per absorbed dose to water per cable length was estimated to be 0.36 ± 0.03 pC Gy−1 cm−1 for PTW ionization chambers. As a result, the contribution of the Compton current to the electrometer readings was estimated to be 0.002% cm−1 for the Farmer‐type, 0.011% cm−1 for the scanning, and 0.088% cm−1 for microchambers, respectively. By the simulation, it was determined that the Compton current for MV x‐ray could be explained by not only recoil electrons due to Compton scattering but also positron due to pair production. The Compton current estimated by the difference in outflowing and inflowing charge was 0.45 pC Gy−1 cm−1 and was comparable with the measured value. Conclusion The cable effect, which includes the leakage current and Compton current, was quantitatively estimated for several chambers from measurements, and the mechanism of Compton current was investigated by Monte Carlo simulation. It was determined that the Compton current is a dominant component of the cable effect and its charge is consistently positive and nearly the same, irrespective of the ionization chamber volume. The contribution of Compton current to the electrometer readings was estimated for chambers. The mechanism of Compton current was analyzed and it was confirmed that the Comp...
Introduction: External beam accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) is an alternative treatment for patients with early-stage breast cancer. The efficacy of image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) using fiducial markers, such as gold markers or surgical clips, has been demonstrated. However, the effects of respiratory motion during a single fraction have not been reported. This study aimed to evaluate the residual image registration error of fiducial marker-based IGRT by respiratory motion and propose a suitable treatment strategy.Materials & Methods: We developed an acrylic phantom embedded with surgical clips to verify the registration error under moving conditions. The frequency of the phase difference in the respiratory cycle due to sequential acquisition was verified in a preliminary study. Fiducial marker-based IGRT was then performed in 10 scenarios. The residual registration error (RRE) was calculated on the basis of the differences in the coordinates of clips between the true position if not moved and the last position.Results: The frequencies of the phase differences in 0.0–0.99, 1.0–1.99, 2.0–2.99, 3.0–3.99, and 4.0–5.0 mm were 23%, 24%, 22%, 20%, and 11%, respectively. When assuming a clinical case, the mean RREs for all directions were within 1.0 mm, even if respiratory motion of 5 mm existed in two axes.Conclusions: For APBI with fiducial marker-based IGRT, the introduction of an image registration strategy that employs stepwise couch correction using at least three orthogonal images should be considered.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.