2017
DOI: 10.1111/jfr3.12296
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Technical note: comparison of methods for threshold selection for extreme sea levels

Abstract: Extreme value analysis is an important tool for studying coastal flood risk, but requires the estimation of a threshold to define an ‘extreme’, which is traditionally undertaken visually. Such subjective judgement is not accurately reproducible, so recently a number of quantitative approaches have been proposed. This paper therefore reviews existing methods, illustrated with coastal tide‐gauge data and the Generalized Pareto Distribution, and proposes a new automated method that mimics the enduringly popular v… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Note that there is an inverse relationship between and . To ensure (13), is substituted with 1 − and normalized for direct illustration…”
Section: Entropy Methodmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Note that there is an inverse relationship between and . To ensure (13), is substituted with 1 − and normalized for direct illustration…”
Section: Entropy Methodmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, the threshold level cannot be too high so that sufficient data can be included [12]. The literature suggests that the most used threshold selection methods are based on judgement [13]. One way is to use graphical diagnostic plots, but interpreting these plots is subjective and rather challenging.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different methods have been proposed for selecting thresholds automatically, e.g. Northrop et al (2017) and Caballero-Megido et al (2018). Different sampling methods may result in different ESL estimates, especially for long return periods.…”
Section: Samplingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the level k 0 leads to a biased estimate of the EVI. Other methods for selecting the threshold can be found in References 13‐15.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%