2014
DOI: 10.2334/josnusd.56.179
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Technical complications with implant-supported dental prostheses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…P. Calderon et al, 2014 reported that the most frequent complications were loss of resin covering the screw (23.8 %), loss of prostheses retention (18.6 %) and fractures of the resin (12.4 %) [5]. A high frequency of misfit between the prosthesis and abutment (25.4 %) was found, which was significantly associated (p < 0.05) with other variables [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…P. Calderon et al, 2014 reported that the most frequent complications were loss of resin covering the screw (23.8 %), loss of prostheses retention (18.6 %) and fractures of the resin (12.4 %) [5]. A high frequency of misfit between the prosthesis and abutment (25.4 %) was found, which was significantly associated (p < 0.05) with other variables [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Caldron et al (2014) reported that the mechanical is the most common complications that occur during the treatments involving implants. The outcome of the prosthesis is influenced by the design characteristics of the prostheses, the type of material used and biomechanical issues.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The stripped abutment screws represented another complication. Potential causes of such complications include unfavorable implant distribution, inadequate fit of the prosthesis, metal fatigue, manufacturing defects, occlusal overload, and parafunctions …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%